Third Jersey Revealed!

[Guest]

Don't like the logo above the name plate either (even on my current jersey) .. looks like a cheap after thought.

Better than where the Riders decided to put theirs.

[iso_55]

So, I have a 70's Dieter Brock jersey. Is the third jersey too close a representation to the 70's to  buy the new third one? The 70's jersey looks a lot better than the current ones the team wears now IMO. What do you guys think?

[johnzo]

iso, I'm in the same boat, I've got a handsome #97 Brown 70s throwback that looks great and starts conversations on the streets here in Seattle ... and 200 bones is a lot of money to spend on yet another sports jersey  ... but I was a HUGE fan of every one of the players in the photo that WBB Fan Girl linked to so I'm definitely tempted to spend the money on a #35 Jones or a #63 Walby.

 

Like a lot of posters here, I think both the 70s and 80s throwbacks look way better than the current jersey.  That royal blue looks so sharp and distinctive; the navy blue is boring and generic.

[iso_55]

I want to have a #2 Clements jersey so I may buy one.

[johnzo]

You ought to just be able to trade your 70s Brock in to get an 80s Clements.

[17to85]

You ought to just be able to trade your 70s Brock in to get an 80s Clements.

[iso_55]

Johnzo, why would I want to trade it? That's not an option for me.

[iso_55]

Johnzo, why would I want to trade it? I won't do that.

[BlueBall]

The fact that BlueBall (and others) will pay whatever for the jersey is probably why they're priced where they are. 

 

I think it's branding driving the price there, moreso than material & labor cost.

 

  Livin' the high life, that's how I roll.