Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
2 hours ago, iHeart said:

and Once's season finale massacre continues, which sucks because I was starting to like her a little

http://tvline.com/2017/05/12/once-upon-a-time-rebecca-mader-leaving-zelena-not-in-season-7/

I fell out of Once Upon A Time in the second season.  I do think it was a brilliant concept and was very well executed, well acted etc.  I just couldn't invest time in the massive mythology they were building.  And I joke to my gf who still watches to let me know when Mickey Mouse shows up.  The gf has said this season sucks.

Also Rumpel should never have cut his hair.

Posted
1 minute ago, The Unknown Poster said:

I fell out of Once Upon A Time in the second season.  I do think it was a brilliant concept and was very well executed, well acted etc.  I just couldn't invest time in the massive mythology they were building.  And I joke to my gf who still watches to let me know when Mickey Mouse shows up.  The gf has said this season sucks.

Also Rumpel should never have cut his hair.

he kind of did in the fourth season, and there was an in-joke at the end of the season that suggested that some guy named Walt was the original Author. I applaud the writers for doing their homework

Posted
4 minutes ago, The Unknown Poster said:

wow.

because let's face it, Once is mostly Disney Fan fiction. But then again you would ask why bother covering Hanzel and Gretel and Rumplestiltskin and Red Riding Hood and the Wizard of Oz if they  never got the animated treatment, but then again it might not be necessary for Disney to cover the wizard of oz

Posted
2 minutes ago, iHeart said:

because let's face it, Once is mostly Disney Fan fiction. But then again you would ask why bother covering Hanzel and Gretel and Rumplestiltskin and Red Riding Hood and the Wizard of Oz if they  never got the animated treatment, but then again it might not be necessary for Disney to cover the wizard of oz

Well OUAT is a great vehicle for Disney.  It might seem counter-intuitive involving non Disney properties (public domain) but if it creates interest in the program that benefits Disney and it's owned properties. 

Since it's Disney, have they referenced an evil Emperor yet, or his "Dark Lord apprentice?"

Posted
3 minutes ago, iHeart said:

but then again it might not be necessary for Disney to cover the wizard of oz

Disney did put out a Oz film recently.

Posted
2 minutes ago, The Unknown Poster said:

Well OUAT is a great vehicle for Disney.  It might seem counter-intuitive involving non Disney properties (public domain) but if it creates interest in the program that benefits Disney and it's owned properties. 

Since it's Disney, have they referenced an evil Emperor yet, or his "Dark Lord apprentice?"

if they do star wars, then I quit

Posted
1 hour ago, The Unknown Poster said:

I fell out of Once Upon A Time in the second season.  I do think it was a brilliant concept and was very well executed, well acted etc.  I just couldn't invest time in the massive mythology they were building.  And I joke to my gf who still watches to let me know when Mickey Mouse shows up.  The gf has said this season sucks.

Also Rumpel should never have cut his hair.

He had to cut it for Trainspotting 2.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...