Nasty Nate Posted July 12, 2014 Report Posted July 12, 2014 Remember how Jets 'tanked' their last few games (ie. winning) to lose a possible 6th draft pick (7th for sure). How far would Jets have had to really tank to avoid picking Ehlers with 9th pick in first round? My guess is that they would have had to have 5th overall to select another players. Didn't make a difference at 6, 7, 8 or 9 - Ehlers would have been their guy. Any other thoughts on this?
17to85 Posted July 12, 2014 Report Posted July 12, 2014 you've seen their draft board have you? This draft basically went thusly: There were 4 guys at the top then another 4 or 5 clustered together.
Mike Posted July 12, 2014 Report Posted July 12, 2014 FWIW, on my incredibly uneducated board built off reading blogs and watching some highlight videos, I had Ehlers 5th on my draft board.
The Unknown Poster Posted July 12, 2014 Report Posted July 12, 2014 I recall speculation was Jets wanted Ehlers and had him higher than where they picked him. Jets certainly arent afraid to go with their internal draft board over the "experts". I do agree Nate, that top 5 would have been something different, but they liked Ehlers.
Goalie Posted July 12, 2014 Report Posted July 12, 2014 Rumours were they were wanting to trade up to get Reinhardt. But Ehlers at 9 is a steal. Canucks probably reached a bit with Virtanen and the Hurricanes went with need instead of skill, They really lack d men in Carolina.
iso_55 Posted July 14, 2014 Report Posted July 14, 2014 When it comes to the NHL Draft... http://www.quickmeme.com/img/36/367bfdf04925024ffe4e22252b33e533a4b77ede146dbcfb985e332d0bcfd8c8.jpg
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now