TrueBlue Posted July 16, 2014 Report Posted July 16, 2014 http://cfl.uploads.mrx.ca/wpg/pdf/depth/2014/Depth075541.pdf
Chaosmonkey Posted July 16, 2014 Report Posted July 16, 2014 Can't say I've poured over other depth charts for other weeks, but 6 MLB? I know it's a lot of in and out all over, just odd to see them stacked at one position.
Valderan_CA Posted July 16, 2014 Report Posted July 16, 2014 Can't say I've poured over other depth charts for other weeks, but 6 MLB? I know it's a lot of in and out all over, just odd to see them stacked at one position. The defensive depth chart looks ******* insane every single week.... if we were losing it would be one of the things people would point out as something that makes us laughable.
GCJenks Posted July 16, 2014 Report Posted July 16, 2014 I am a little surprised to see Kelly listed on the Depth Chart, I thought he had been ruled out. Would have expected him on the 1 Game I.R, and someone else added to the roster.
Mike Posted July 16, 2014 Report Posted July 16, 2014 He'll be on the 2 man inactive roster. Cap savings that way.
Mark F Posted July 16, 2014 Report Posted July 16, 2014 It would be good to see the speedy Denmark do a little more.
TrueBlue Posted July 16, 2014 Author Report Posted July 16, 2014 It would be good to see the speedy Denmark do a little more. I have seen him plenty of times draw in coverage and allow for other guys to get in more space. Our receiving core seems to be one of the most well-rounded groups in the league, where our receivers are working as a committee to move the ball. Mr Dee 1
Mike Posted July 16, 2014 Report Posted July 16, 2014 It would be good to see the speedy Denmark do a little more. He's 10th in the league in receiving despite being 3rd on our team. I'd say he's doing just fine so far.
17to85 Posted July 16, 2014 Report Posted July 16, 2014 Denmark had some issues catching with a guy on him but I don't know that we can say he's not doing his job. He's drawn more than a couple pass interference calls, the catches will come, especially I think if Moore starts to draw more attention.
Fraser Posted July 16, 2014 Report Posted July 16, 2014 I like how well the ball is being spread around. You can key in on any one reciever and shut us down.
Mark F Posted July 16, 2014 Report Posted July 16, 2014 ok, thanks, makes sense, what you all are saying about Denmark. although I thought that he'd made some big plays in past years, and in preseason this year, which I don't recall seeing yet. as Fraser said, if not him, someone else, so doesn't matter.
Blueandgold Posted July 16, 2014 Report Posted July 16, 2014 It seems to be that Denmark is much more effective when playing out of the slot. They've been moving guys around and playing him out wide a lot which I think hurts his production a little bit.
Mr Dee Posted July 16, 2014 Report Posted July 16, 2014 I like how well the ball is being spread around. You can key in on any one reciever and shut us down. You could see that in the last drive, Willy targeted: Grigsby, Feoli-Gudino, Grigsby, Kohlert, Grigsby, Kelly, Moore, Denmark, Feoli-Gudino, JFG for the TD. 10 passes, 6 different receivers, 1 drive….priceless.
IC Khari Posted July 16, 2014 Report Posted July 16, 2014 It looks like Suber may have lost his job to Johnson, fine with that ...
kelownabomberfan Posted July 16, 2014 Report Posted July 16, 2014 I like how well the ball is being spread around. You can key in on any one reciever and shut us down. ?? That is a contradictory statement?
holoman Posted July 16, 2014 Report Posted July 16, 2014 I like how well the ball is being spread around. You can key in on any one reciever and shut us down. ?? That is a contradictory statement? I think he meant can't, not can.
gbill2004 Posted July 16, 2014 Report Posted July 16, 2014 He'll be on the 2 man inactive roster. Cap savings that way. Can you explain? Guys on the 2 man inactive roster still get paid their full salary.
JuranBoldenRules Posted July 16, 2014 Report Posted July 16, 2014 He'll be on the 2 man inactive roster. Cap savings that way. Can you explain? Guys on the 2 man inactive roster still get paid their full salary. Put him on 1 game IR, add player from PR to 46 = 2 game cheques. Leave Kelly on 46, make him one of the 2 inactive players= 1 game cheque.
JuranBoldenRules Posted July 16, 2014 Report Posted July 16, 2014 Washington on punts again? The Russian roulette punt returner.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now