Note To Miller: Please Don't Do Anything Too Soon And Too Drastic

[Captain Blue]

  On 2013-08-12 at 4:50 PM, 17to85 said:

starting Hall isn't necessarily a bad move, a lot of people figured he'd wind up as the #2 coming out of camp anyway and might be the best option for the season. The real issue is how much this just screams coaches desperately trying to save their own asses now that the GM has been canned. Hated the timing when it happened, hated it more now. Yeah 1-5 sucks, but with back to back with Hamilton on the way it was a great chance to get into a better spot... then with back to back against Edmonton not far away either it was yet another chance to improve their lot. Now we're seeing a bunch of what appear to be knee jerk moves and it really does look like they just threw in the towel already.

I find it odd Goltz gets hooked before what would have been likely his two easiest starts. That I can't get over.

[iso_55]

Tells you what the orgnization thinks of Goltz. Truly. There's a sense by the Powers That Be the kid won't ever be a long term starter for the Bombers. D3 qb for a reason. Burke in annointing him the starter "going forward" was just dumb made by a dumb coach.

[Fraser]

  On 2013-08-12 at 4:53 PM, Captain Blue said:

I find it odd Goltz gets hooked before what would have been likely his two easiest starts. That I can't get over.

chucking it in the dirt too much

[Noeller]

  On 2013-08-12 at 4:50 PM, 17to85 said:

starting Hall isn't necessarily a bad move, a lot of people figured he'd wind up as the #2 coming out of camp anyway and might be the best option for the season. The real issue is how much this just screams coaches desperately trying to save their own asses now that the GM has been canned. Hated the timing when it happened, hated it more now. Yeah 1-5 sucks, but with back to back with Hamilton on the way it was a great chance to get into a better spot... then with back to back against Edmonton not far away either it was yet another chance to improve their lot. Now we're seeing a bunch of what appear to be knee jerk moves and it really does look like they just threw in the towel already. 

...and yet the club says the exact opposite. They apparently told Goltz the reason they're going with Hall is because they need to win now...

[iso_55]

  On 2013-08-12 at 5:39 PM, Fraser said:

chucking it in the dirt too much

Missing open receivers. The slots are gonna get killed running those routes over the middle & he throws high or behind like he does. That alone should be enough for him to be benched. 

[17to85]

  On 2013-08-12 at 5:41 PM, Noeller said:

...and yet the club says the exact opposite. They apparently told Goltz the reason they're going with Hall is because they need to win now...

To me it looks like the coaches are going full MIke Kelly. Gonna be a revolving door at qb with each loss hoping that the next guy will save their jobs for them. 

[Zontar]

Promoting Pierce to no.2, if true, is simply incredulous.

[Fraser]

  On 2013-08-12 at 5:41 PM, iso_55 said:

Missing open receivers. The slots are gonna get killed running those routes over the middle & he throws high or behind like he does. That alone should be enough for him to be benched.

I agree it would get them killed but could be an issue resolved with timing and practice. missing a wide open edwards or simpson in the flat is inexcusable though

[Noeller]

  On 2013-08-12 at 5:43 PM, 17to85 said:

To me it looks like the coaches are going full MIke Kelly. Gonna be a revolving door at qb with each loss hoping that the next guy will save their jobs for them. 

*sob*...

[Blueandgold]

  On 2013-08-12 at 5:38 PM, iso_55 said:

Tells you what the orgnization thinks of Goltz. Truly. There's a sense by the Powers That Be the kid won't ever be a long term starter for the Bombers. D3 qb for a reason. Burke in annointing him the starter "going forward" was just dumb made by a dumb coach.

Are the powers that be qualified to say who has long term potential? 

[iso_55]

  On 2013-08-12 at 5:50 PM, Blueandgold said:

Are the powers that be qualified to say who has long term potential? 

The Powers That Be in charge TODAY do. Who knows about tomorrow?

[SmokinBlue]

  On 2013-08-12 at 4:38 PM, Zontar said:

Is starting Max Hall for a home divisional game STUPID enough for y'all ?

fixed.

[SmokinBlue]

  On 2013-08-12 at 5:41 PM, Noeller said:

...and yet the club says the exact opposite. They apparently told Goltz the reason they're going with Hall is because they need to win now...

braindead to say the least.