Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Bucknor's been doin fine, you'll be surprised how many pass knockdowns he has... I can think of two right off the top of my head, and he's always right there in coverage

Posted

Just looked it up pass knock downs

Sears 2

Bruce Johnson 2

Leggett 3 (impressive considering he's only played 2 or 3 games)

Washington 1

Bucknor 2

Randle 3

Posted

Bucknor is playing much better than Jovon Johnson did last year, and he's a Canadian. Says a lot about what a great job Walters has done upgrading the talent level.

 

Bucknor is playing much better than Jovon Johnson did last year, and he's a Canadian. Says a lot about what a great job Walters has done upgrading the talent level.

 

and how bad JJ has gotten (no offense to Bucknor though I agree he's been playing well). Oh, forgot, JJ is 'back' if he does say so himself. 

Posted

The important thing..... is that this team is changing the way.... it thinks

 

Precisely.  They actually had a workable Plan B when a Canadian lineman went down.  When was the last time that happened?

Posted

This is a really nice thread Mike ... good insight on your part .... I am looking forward to Fitzgerald starting to shine .... I expect he could become an important slotback for us ... not a speedy Gonzales but owning the middle of the field when there is lots of traffic there

Posted

As we thought 'outside the box' when we used our tight end formation and passed the ball to the tight ends, we thought outside the box when we signed players to utilize when the the need arose.

Case in point…signing Feoli-Gudino to compliment Corey Watson when he inevitably went down.

Worked out really fine so far.

Posted

Plenty of teams pay lip service to the concept "next man up"....but, this team just does it, week in, week out.

Because they had too.

That being said. Toronto looks pathetic with they depth/ backups on offence.

Posted

 

Plenty of teams pay lip service to the concept "next man up"....but, this team just does it, week in, week out.

Because they had too.

That being said. Toronto looks pathetic with they depth/ backups on offence.

 

 

Well, if Watson, Moore AND Denmark went down at once, our depth might be a different story...

Posted

I think having to play Sewell at tackle was as big of a factor as not having Owens and Durie. The left tackle position was one of glaring weakness and the riders just exploited it.

Posted

As we thought 'outside the box' when we used our tight end formation and passed the ball to the tight ends, we thought outside the box when we signed players to utilize when the the need arose.

Case in point…signing Feoli-Gudino to compliment Corey Watson when he inevitably went down.

Worked out really fine so far.

 

Which is why I think so many on here dislike(d) the double tight end set.  They remember it from the past, where the opposition always knew we were going to run when the extra blockers came out. Nothing like a few throws to the fullback to keep them off-balance.

Posted

I especially like the tight end set with all the smaller LBer's that seem to be trending with teams.

Yup. Watching beasts like fitzgerald get matched up with a sam in space is pretty entertaining... Even pontibrand would bulldoze thru most me thinks..

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...