Mr. Perfect Posted February 10, 2015 Report Posted February 10, 2015 Arash Madani @ArashMadani 14m14 minutes ago Per #CFL sources: The Winnipeg Blue Bombers have interest in Saskatchewan LB Brian Peters in free agency tomorrow. Registered 78 tackles along with 20 special teams tackles last season. Throw in three sacks and a couple picks as well.
rebusrankin Posted February 10, 2015 Report Posted February 10, 2015 Can Peters play MLB? Is he a better value than Curran? GB can you post the link where Penton said SirVincent over Stanley?
gbill2004 Posted February 10, 2015 Report Posted February 10, 2015 Can Peters play MLB? Is he a better value than Curran? GB can you post the link where Penton said SirVincent over Stanley?
Blueandgold Posted February 10, 2015 Report Posted February 10, 2015 Can Peters play MLB? Is he a better value than Curran? GB can you post the link where Penton said SirVincent over Stanley?
gbill2004 Posted February 10, 2015 Report Posted February 10, 2015 And there's this: @ArashMadani: Per #CFL sources: the Winnipeg Blue #Bombers also have interest in Calgary’s Stanley Bryant, one of the top OL on the free agency market.
Goalie Posted February 10, 2015 Report Posted February 10, 2015 Lol. Sounds like the bombers are telling different media guys different things.
mbrg Posted February 10, 2015 Report Posted February 10, 2015 Lol. Sounds like the bombers are telling different media guys different things. Penton wasn't saying the Bombers preferred SirVincent, he was explaining why they might prefer him over Bryant.
gbill2004 Posted February 10, 2015 Report Posted February 10, 2015 Lol. Sounds like the bombers are telling different media guys different things.Penton wasn't saying the Bombers preferred SirVincent, he was explaining why they might prefer him over Bryant.No actually Penton said he's hearing the Bombers prefer SirVincent over Bryant because of perceived value.
Floyd Posted February 10, 2015 Report Posted February 10, 2015 So they are saying we'll go after the best import OL available and the standout MLB that last worked with our current DC mind equals blown.
gbill2004 Posted February 10, 2015 Report Posted February 10, 2015 So they are saying we'll go after the best import OL available and the standout MLB that last worked with our current DC mind equals blown. I don't think Peters is a MLB.
Floyd Posted February 10, 2015 Report Posted February 10, 2015 My bad, peters plays all LB positions, but he is still the best MLB available
AKAChip Posted February 10, 2015 Report Posted February 10, 2015 My bad, peters plays all LB positions, but he is still the best MLB available Curran is better and a true mlb. At the very least he is better at mlb. Peters is far more effective at WILL as a rider. James and StudentSection 2
Floyd Posted February 10, 2015 Report Posted February 10, 2015 My bad, peters plays all LB positions, but he is still the best MLB available
AKAChip Posted February 10, 2015 Report Posted February 10, 2015 I disagree. He is the best WILL. Curran is a far more effective mlb. StudentSection and iso_55 2
Floyd Posted February 10, 2015 Report Posted February 10, 2015 I disagree. He is the best WILL. Curran is a far more effective mlb. Fair enough. I'd say the days of wil Mac and Sam are almost gone anyway - lbs are interchangeable Curran is better with jones, peters is better with hall
Mike Posted February 10, 2015 Report Posted February 10, 2015 I disagree. He is the best WILL. Curran is a far more effective mlb.Fair enough. I'd say the days of wil Mac and Sam are almost gone anyway - lbs are interchangeableCurran is better with jones, peters is better with hall Errrr what?
BigBlue Posted February 10, 2015 Report Posted February 10, 2015 What happened to tomorrow's chat room thread?
SPuDS Posted February 10, 2015 Report Posted February 10, 2015 I disagree. He is the best WILL. Curran is a far more effective mlb.Fair enough. I'd say the days of wil Mac and Sam are almost gone anyway - lbs are interchangeableCurran is better with jones, peters is better with hall Errrr what? I second that.. I see argument at WIL and MAC. you want a smaller MAC type LB at WIL IMO but can be interchangeable but in almost no real world defenses would you ever swap a SAM and a MAC. When would you ever see Kelly Malveux or Johnny Sears patrolling the middle..
iso_55 Posted February 10, 2015 Report Posted February 10, 2015 Those are all 3 different positions. They're not interchangeable. Curran is a stud. That's the guy I'd like in the middle. TBURGESS 1
SPuDS Posted February 10, 2015 Report Posted February 10, 2015 Those are all 3 different positions. They're not interchangeable. Curran is a stud. That's the guy I'd like in the middle. Well, when BC has solly and bigshnoz on the field at the same time, they in a 4-3 still and both guys who are MLBs playing WIL and MAC, no?
iso_55 Posted February 11, 2015 Report Posted February 11, 2015 They have guys who can play both but generally it's not interchageable. Could Keon Raymond play in the middle of the Calgary linebacking corps?
SPuDS Posted February 11, 2015 Report Posted February 11, 2015 That's my point ISO. You wouldn't have a SAM in the WIL or MAC spots... Keon doesn't play WIL does he?
iso_55 Posted February 11, 2015 Report Posted February 11, 2015 I don't know what the conversation is here. Both Bighill & Elimimian can play inside or out BUT... they can't cover like a Keon Raymond does. And Raymond can't play the run like they do as he is too small. Are we talking the same thing here? Those 2 are exceptional athletes. Some guys are just natural inside or outside linebackers. They can do both.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now