IC Khari Posted April 1, 2015 Report Posted April 1, 2015 Just like in years past when it counts, Pav can't make the big save at the critical times in the big games.I'd go back to Hutch against the Canucks and see if we can start winning again!
Goalie Posted April 1, 2015 Report Posted April 1, 2015 You serious? Had no chance on all 3. Hutch plays and we lose too
IC Khari Posted April 1, 2015 Author Report Posted April 1, 2015 I don't know, he didn't play that bad I guess and he can't score and we need more of that for sure...
Goalie Posted April 1, 2015 Report Posted April 1, 2015 We dominated but lost because of breakdowns and penalties
FrostyWinnipeg Posted April 1, 2015 Report Posted April 1, 2015 Great 1st period but lack of shots in second. Almost felt like putting Buff up front.
Mr. Perfect Posted April 1, 2015 Report Posted April 1, 2015 You can't blame Pavelec for what happened tonight. The team as a whole like Sunday didn't perform in the final 20 minutes when it mattered the most.
Goalie Posted April 1, 2015 Report Posted April 1, 2015 Buff gonna be suspended for his vicious cheap shot crosscheck on miller
Goalie Posted April 1, 2015 Report Posted April 1, 2015 Team out played the Rangers all game long. Out played Chicago too but just can't capitalize on their chances and they had tons of chances
Goalie Posted April 1, 2015 Report Posted April 1, 2015 Jets need a legit sniper. Paging nik ehlers really
The Unknown Poster Posted April 1, 2015 Report Posted April 1, 2015 There is an argument to be made in starting hutch that goes beyond whether pavs was good or not. Teams sometimes rally around that switch. I'd start pavs again only because now isn't the time for experiments. But I'd have a short leash if the team wasn't playing great in front of him.
gbill2004 Posted April 1, 2015 Report Posted April 1, 2015 Pavs should have saved the game winning goal. He was out of position, as usual.
Mr. Perfect Posted April 1, 2015 Report Posted April 1, 2015 Pavs should have saved the game winning goal. He was out of position, as usual. ....What?! Listen the last thing I am is a Pavelec booster or supporter but when it's a partial breakaway as it was when Kreider made Byfuglien look stupid at the blue line, Pavelec played that as well as he could under the circumstances. He stretched out to make the pad save but Kreider went to his back hand and BARELY fit the puck in. To say he was out of position is not remotely correct whatsoever, and to say he should have made the stop considering it was a partial break shows how foolish that comment is. Even folks in peewee or bantam hockey wouldn't say he was out of position. Krieder just made a heck of a play. It's as simple as that. I'd like to say I'm surprised by your comment but for someone who suggests calling up Connor Hellebuyck for the stretch run, someone with ZERO NHL experience (Yes a great prospect no question), or implies this team is better without Dustin Byfugien, sadly I'm not surprised at all.
gbill2004 Posted April 1, 2015 Report Posted April 1, 2015 Pavs should have saved the game winning goal. He was out of position, as usual.....What?! Listen the last thing I am is a Pavelec booster or supporter but when it's a partial breakaway as it was when Kreider made Byfuglien look stupid at the blue line, Pavelec played that as well as he could under the circumstances. He stretched out to make the pad save but Kreider went to his back hand and BARELY fit the puck in. To say he was out of position is not remotely correct whatsoever, and to say he should have made the stop considering it was a partial break shows how foolish that comment is. Even folks in peewee or bantam hockey wouldn't say he was out of position. Krieder just made a heck of a play. It's as simple as that. I'd like to say I'm surprised by your comment but for someone who suggests calling up Connor Hellebuyck for the stretch run, someone with ZERO NHL experience (Yes a great prospect no question), or implies this team is better without Dustin Byfugien, sadly I'm not surprised at all.Pavelec's skate/leg should have been touching the post on that breakaway. He was almost a foot out of position.
Y2C Posted April 2, 2015 Report Posted April 2, 2015 Right. I totally forgot. Pavelec's job is to let pucks in the net, not stop them. My bad.
gbill2004 Posted April 2, 2015 Report Posted April 2, 2015 Right. I totally forgot. Pavelec's job is to let pucks in the net, not stop them. My bad. You're just trolling in this thread, right? Sorry, it's hard to tell sometimes.
Mr Dee Posted April 2, 2015 Report Posted April 2, 2015 Can't say I agree with you. I've been watching a lot of hockey lately between the teams the Jets and the Canucks play and I have to say the Goaltending the Jets have been getting in the last little while has been more stable than not. They've even won a few games because of their G-tending more so than they've lost because of it. So to say Pavs is terrible is a little far far-fetched. As a matter of fact, you could say Pavelec is a big reason the Jets are still in the hunt for a playoff spot. Ducky 1
gbill2004 Posted April 2, 2015 Report Posted April 2, 2015 Can't say I agree with you. I've been watching a lot of hockey lately between the teams the Jets and the Canucks play and I have to say the Goaltending the Jets have been getting in the last little while has been more stable than not. They've even won a few games because of their G-tending more so than they've lost because of it. So to say Pavs is terrible is a little far far-fetched. As a matter of fact, you could say Pavelec is a big reason the Jets are still in the hunt for a playoff spot.
Mr Dee Posted April 2, 2015 Report Posted April 2, 2015 And yet this year the stats show he's 18th in save % and 17th in goals against avg. So is the team playing better in front of him? SPuDS 1
Atomic Posted April 2, 2015 Report Posted April 2, 2015 Definitely not a Pavelec supporter myself but gbill you clearly do not understand what it means when people say a goalie is out of position. If a goalie bites on a deke on a breakaway, that is not the time to say he was out of position. That is just not the correct use of that term.
gbill2004 Posted April 2, 2015 Report Posted April 2, 2015 Definitely not a Pavelec supporter myself but gbill you clearly do not understand what it means when people say a goalie is out of position. If a goalie bites on a deke on a breakaway, that is not the time to say he was out of position. That is just not the correct use of that term.
Goalie Posted April 2, 2015 Report Posted April 2, 2015 Kreider made one hell of a move, BUFF did not have him defended, buff got owned really. It was a nice move and nice goal by Kreider, Blaming Pavelec on that one is just crazy and obviously from someone who has never played hockey, or if so, was a terrible teammate. Sometimes, the other guy just makes a nice move, that's what that goal by Kreider was, he beat Buff to the puck and made a nice move on the goalie, the only move he could really have made to beat him and did it in a split second really, Pav had him but, Kreider made a great move. Why always looking to blame Pavelec? Why can't it just be the ranger player made a nice move and scored?
Atomic Posted April 2, 2015 Report Posted April 2, 2015 In what universe did Byfuglien have one side defended??? He was out of the play. Being able to tap a guy with the end of your stick from 3 feet behind doesn't mean one side is defended.
Mark H. Posted April 2, 2015 Report Posted April 2, 2015 Definitely not a Pavelec supporter myself but gbill you clearly do not understand what it means when people say a goalie is out of position. If a goalie bites on a deke on a breakaway, that is not the time to say he was out of position. That is just not the correct use of that term.Thing is on the game winner, it wasn't a breakaway. Byfuglien had him defended coming from one side. Pavelec didn't protect the area of the front side of the net that he needed to. I don't usually weigh in on these debates, but Buff clearly did not have him defended. Noeller 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now