Protecting the QB's: NFL vs. CFL

[WBBFanWest]

Here's a thought, maybe the Bombers don't think it was a cheap shot or an "illegal" hit.  Maybe, they see it as a hard tackle and nothing more.  Might explain their lack of outrage.

[gbill2004]

Here's a thought, maybe the Bombers don't think it was a cheap shot or an "illegal" hit. Maybe, they see it as a hard tackle and nothing more. Might explain their lack of outrage.

Walters was screaming at the refs throughout the game, after the hit, so I'd think they believe it was dirty.

[WBBFanWest]

 

Here's a thought, maybe the Bombers don't think it was a cheap shot or an "illegal" hit. Maybe, they see it as a hard tackle and nothing more. Might explain their lack of outrage.

Walters was screaming at the refs throughout the game, after the hit, so I'd think they believe it was dirty.

 

Or... he believed that a penalty was warranted, which is not quite the same as calling it a dirty hit, which, if you watch the replay objectively is hard, in my opinion to make a case for.  And if he really did feel that strongly why, as of now, have they not appealed to the League for further sanctions?

[gbill2004]

Here's a thought, maybe the Bombers don't think it was a cheap shot or an "illegal" hit. Maybe, they see it as a hard tackle and nothing more. Might explain their lack of outrage.

Walters was screaming at the refs throughout the game, after the hit, so I'd think they believe it was dirty.

Or... he believed that a penalty was warranted, which is not quite the same as calling it a dirty hit, which, if you watch the replay objectively is hard, in my opinion to make a case for. And if he really did feel that strongly why, as of now, have they not appealed to the League for further sanctions?

How do you know they haven't? Last media report was around 6pm yesterday.