Mike Posted August 27, 2013 Report Posted August 27, 2013 Warren Kean 2.0 being added to our practice roster apparently.
rebusrankin Posted August 27, 2013 Report Posted August 27, 2013 I am so glad that they are focusing on the real issue, the kicking game and not getting distracted with working on the OL, Defense backs, receivers etc.
Mike Posted August 27, 2013 Author Report Posted August 27, 2013 I am so glad that they are focusing on the real issue, the kicking game and not getting distracted with working on the OL, Defense backs, receivers etc. I know you're frustrated, but how do you expect them to seriously address the OL mid-season? They've been bringing in defensive backs and receivers.
Captain Blue Posted August 27, 2013 Report Posted August 27, 2013 It seems Tim Burke really didn't like Palardy - and it seems likely that Mack continued to force that roster move. Two kickers in a matter of weeks already.
Dirty30 Posted August 27, 2013 Report Posted August 27, 2013 If they really wanted to bring in a kicker to make an immediate impact, why did they not go after p/k Hugh O'Neil from BC before he signed with the Eskimoes.
OldSchoolBlue Posted August 27, 2013 Report Posted August 27, 2013 If they really wanted to bring in a kicker to make an immediate impact, why did they not go after p/k Hugh O'Neil from BC before he signed with the Eskimoes. We don't know that they didn't .... maybe he just chose the Eskies over us. He is from Edmonton originally, isn't he?
sweep the leg Posted August 27, 2013 Report Posted August 27, 2013 If they really wanted to bring in a kicker to make an immediate impact, why did they not go after p/k Hugh O'Neil from BC before he signed with the Eskimoes. We don't know that they didn't .... maybe he just chose the Eskies over us. He is from Edmonton originally, isn't he? Exactly. Given this move, and the signing of DeAngelis, it's probably a safe bet to assume we did try.
Floyd Posted August 27, 2013 Report Posted August 27, 2013 I am so glad that they are focusing on the real issue, the kicking game and not getting distracted with working on the OL, Defense backs, receivers etc. I know you're frustrated, but how do you expect them to seriously address the OL mid-season? They've been bringing in defensive backs and receivers. Normally, I would agree about the OL but our guys just seem to have no chemistry with each other or Simpson or even the QB... at the very very least, inserting Simmons or Douglas might help somewhat Any NI OL on the practice roster might be a start... somehow Burke has managed to show that he doesn't think Morely is good enough but then give up on Swiston after one game - might as well start blowing it up now
TrueBlue Posted August 27, 2013 Report Posted August 27, 2013 One would have to think that Palardy's as good as gone now.
OldSchoolBlue Posted August 27, 2013 Report Posted August 27, 2013 One would have to think that Palardy's as good as gone now. At the very least, it appears that they are doing everything in their power to make him expendable.
kelownabomberfan Posted August 27, 2013 Report Posted August 27, 2013 It seems Tim Burke really didn't like Palardy - and it seems likely that Mack continued to force that roster move. Two kickers in a matter of weeks already. I think that was confirmed by the fact that he blew the Banjo Bowl game last year and had Renaud punt rather than kick the FG to win the game.
Floyd Posted August 27, 2013 Report Posted August 27, 2013 It seems Tim Burke really didn't like Palardy - and it seems likely that Mack continued to force that roster move. Two kickers in a matter of weeks already. I think that was confirmed by the fact that he blew the Banjo Bowl game last year and had Renaud punt rather than kick the FG to win the game. Well, how was it that Palardy had no competition in camp then...? Except for one kick by Cameron who we then just cut outright...
kelownabomberfan Posted August 27, 2013 Report Posted August 27, 2013 It seems Tim Burke really didn't like Palardy - and it seems likely that Mack continued to force that roster move. Two kickers in a matter of weeks already. I think that was confirmed by the fact that he blew the Banjo Bowl game last year and had Renaud punt rather than kick the FG to win the game. Well, how was it that Palardy had no competition in camp then...? Except for one kick by Cameron who we then just cut outright... I think it was explained by the comment "Mack forced that roster move"?
DR. CFL Posted August 27, 2013 Report Posted August 27, 2013 Warren Kean...r u f'in kidding me. That walking band aid. Tell the therapist to put a reserved sign on a spot for that puke.
Blueandgold Posted August 27, 2013 Report Posted August 27, 2013 If we cut Palardy for McKnight and Sandra I'm going to lose it. DR. CFL 1
DR. CFL Posted August 27, 2013 Report Posted August 27, 2013 We bring in Sandro because Of Palardy's poor kickoffs and the kickoffs have been as bad or worse.
Mr Dee Posted August 27, 2013 Report Posted August 27, 2013 One thing I can say about Sandro is he's already converted more tricks plays in one try than we have in 3 years or more.
Jpan85 Posted August 27, 2013 Report Posted August 27, 2013 We bring in Sandro because Of Palardy's poor kickoffs and the kickoffs have been as bad or worse. Really did you bother to check, Sandro's five kick offs are 65, 60, 61, 60, and 56. An average of 60.4 compared to Palardy's 54.4.
sweep the leg Posted August 27, 2013 Report Posted August 27, 2013 We bring in Sandro because Of Palardy's poor kickoffs and the kickoffs have been as bad or worse. Really did you bother to check, Sandro's five kick offs are 65, 60, 61, 60, and 56. An average of 60.4 compared to Palardy's 54.4. And I don't think any of them have gone out of bounds.
Super Duper Negatron Posted August 27, 2013 Report Posted August 27, 2013 We bring in Sandro because Of Palardy's poor kickoffs and the kickoffs have been as bad or worse. ???? Have people gone off the deep end?
Mike Posted August 27, 2013 Author Report Posted August 27, 2013 We bring in Sandro because Of Palardy's poor kickoffs and the kickoffs have been as bad or worse. I'm super happy that you bothered to research your hypothesis before sharing your findings with us.
tacklewasher Posted August 27, 2013 Report Posted August 27, 2013 We bring in Sandro because Of Palardy's poor kickoffs and the kickoffs have been as bad or worse. ???? Have people gone off the deep end? I think we have gone to the "people can just make up whatever **** they want" end.
kelownabomberfan Posted August 27, 2013 Report Posted August 27, 2013 We bring in Sandro because Of Palardy's poor kickoffs and the kickoffs have been as bad or worse. ???? Have people gone off the deep end? I think we have gone to the "people can just make up whatever **** they want" end. When did we stop doing that?
Bomber_fanaddict Posted August 27, 2013 Report Posted August 27, 2013 Dr. CFL reeks of Nasty Nate/Lyle E style......
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now