gbill2004 Posted July 26, 2015 Report Posted July 26, 2015 Brohm may very well be the worst QB I've ever seen in a Bombers uniform.Jason Boltus.
sweep the leg Posted July 26, 2015 Report Posted July 26, 2015 I wish the positivists would show up and say something. They always say the negatives only show up after a loss. How come they only show up after a win? It's better to wait a day or two for the noise to die down. Once the OMG THE WORLD IS ENDING!!!! posts fade out a rational discussion can be had about what's gone wrong. For me, I was much more upset about Stamps game than I was about last night. We had the game in Calgary and blew it. Last night is a game that's easy to forget b/c it's just one of those games where everything goes wrong. I don't think it's a reflection of how good we can be. Goalie and bearpants 2
Yourface Posted July 26, 2015 Report Posted July 26, 2015 True, Boltus is probably worse. Dinwiddie at least had a few decent games.
Dr. Blue Posted July 26, 2015 Report Posted July 26, 2015 It's not that I want to see Marve play, I just don't want to see Brohm play.... SPuDS, Goalie and Brandon Blue&Gold 3
Goalie Posted July 26, 2015 Report Posted July 26, 2015 It's not that I want to see Marve play, I just don't want to see Brohm play.... I actually agree with this. Brohm has shown nothing at all. How long can his leash be really. SPuDS 1
Dascow Posted July 26, 2015 Report Posted July 26, 2015 When people are content, they don't speak up. It's when they are frustrated that they raise their voice. It's just human nature. If I recall correctly, the pass to Richards was not a well thrown ball, which is why Richards was laying on the turf to catch it. It did hit his hands though, so he should have had it. Watching Brohm out there was frustrating. I wanted to see Marve as well and could not understand why they where not putting him in. But, if Marve was hurt then that would explain it. blitzmore and wpgallday1960 2
Yourface Posted July 26, 2015 Report Posted July 26, 2015 Even Jason Vega feels bad for Marve Jason Vega @VegaJason 17 hil y a 17 heuresToronto, OntarioVoir la traduction Someone pay Marve's ransom. That's gotta be it right? Tracker 1
B-F-F-C Posted July 26, 2015 Report Posted July 26, 2015 If we can ignore the conspiracy theorists. Marve hasn't been our short yardage QB for a couple of games now. So its quite possible that is injury is real. Goalie and SPuDS 2
iso_55 Posted July 26, 2015 Report Posted July 26, 2015 When people are content, they don't speak up. It's when they are frustrated that they raise their voice. It's just human nature. If I recall correctly, the pass to Richards was not a well thrown ball, which is why Richards was laying on the turf to catch it. It did hit his hands though, so he should have had it. Watching Brohm out there was frustrating. I wanted to see Marve as well and could not understand why they where not putting him in. But, if Marve was hurt then that would explain it. It'd be nice if our HC would explain the situation & tell us what is going on with Marve. But he's too busy balancing that huge 2 by 4 on his shoulder for that.
do or die Posted July 26, 2015 Author Report Posted July 26, 2015 A little clarity would go a long way here. If Marve is hurt, then Brohm had/has to go in. Simple. MOS is simply doing himself no favors, here. Fatty Liver and Yourface 2
Tracker Posted July 26, 2015 Report Posted July 26, 2015 And by the way: exactly how was Stoudemire better than the returner (Veltung)he replaced?
Dascow Posted July 26, 2015 Report Posted July 26, 2015 And by the way: exactly how was Stoudemire better than the returner (Veltung)he replaced? I was wondering about that too, but then I checked the roster and noticed that Veltung is on the injured list.
gbill2004 Posted July 26, 2015 Report Posted July 26, 2015 And by the way: exactly how was Stoudemire better than the returner (Veltung)he replaced? I was wondering about that too, but then I checked the roster and noticed that Veltung is on the injured list. He's not really injured.
iso_55 Posted July 26, 2015 Report Posted July 26, 2015 Veltung is way better. If he isn't hurt then he should be doing the returning. Mark F 1
gbill2004 Posted July 26, 2015 Report Posted July 26, 2015 Veltung is way better. If he isn't hurt then he should be doing the returning.Stoudermire got the fat long-term contract tho.
iso_55 Posted July 26, 2015 Report Posted July 26, 2015 Veltung is way better. If he isn't hurt then he should be doing the returning.Stoudermire got the fat long-term contract tho. Veltung is way better. If he isn't hurt then he should be doing the returning.Stoudermire got the fat long-term contract tho.Gllllleat (Scottish accent).
Yourface Posted July 27, 2015 Report Posted July 27, 2015 Stoudermire was among the best returners in the league last year. I'm willing to give him another game. Mr Dee, Goalie and blitzmore 3
Goalie Posted July 27, 2015 Report Posted July 27, 2015 I think they need to find a way for both Veltung and Stoudemire to be on the game day roster.
gbill2004 Posted July 27, 2015 Report Posted July 27, 2015 I think they need to find a way for both Veltung and Stoudemire to be on the game day roster.If Moore is out this week, we will likely see that.
Tracker Posted July 27, 2015 Report Posted July 27, 2015 No matter who is the returner, if we don't block better for him, we will get the same result. Yourface 1
Goalie Posted July 27, 2015 Report Posted July 27, 2015 Or you know like last night the kicker keeps angling it out of bounds. Seriously if Shaw had 10 punts 9 of them were angled out of bounds. Dude was money last night on his punts. It's the Brandon banks thing really. Just like with banks teams know Stoudemire can make a difference so they try to kick it away from him. Last night shaw was money
Tracker Posted July 27, 2015 Report Posted July 27, 2015 Whatever kicks Stoudemire did field, he had virtually no room to move before the Esks were right on top of him.
17to85 Posted July 27, 2015 Report Posted July 27, 2015 Stoudermire was among the best returners in the league last year. I'm willing to give him another game. He's not getting it done and the other guy has gotten it done, isn't that the entire basis of your Marve vs. Brohm support? Why the different opinion here? Stoudemire might have been great last year, but this year he's been useless and actually a detriment to the team whereas Veltung has been good. 2 chances is plenty in my opinion, when the CFL is as tight as it is you can't piss away games letting guys figure it out. rebusrankin 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now