Goalie Posted December 27, 2016 Report Posted December 27, 2016 Not a big Jays fan but it seemed like they were basically.. hit a home run or strike out... they couldn't really manufacture runs. It was via long ball or nothing. I actually think that they might be better than people think without Edwin and Bautista. Not sure why. But I look around the league and I see teams winning via playing the short game if you will... the long ball teams are pretty inconsistent actually.
wbbfan Posted January 4, 2017 Report Posted January 4, 2017 Aaron sanchez has hired the boras co to represent him as agents.... bad news for the jays. http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2017/01/aaron-sanchez-hires-boras-corporation.html?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=facebook
bustamente Posted January 17, 2017 Report Posted January 17, 2017 So Bautista signs with Jays for 18m. with options, 36 often injured can't really play the field anymore, Jays pitching better be lights out.
Noeller Posted January 17, 2017 Report Posted January 17, 2017 ...batting .200 with RISP.......$18 million bucks. Christ.....
wbbfan Posted January 17, 2017 Report Posted January 17, 2017 1 hour ago, Noeller said: ...batting .200 with RISP.......$18 million bucks. Christ..... last year was an uncharacteristic awful year. You arent paying him for last year, you are paying him for the potential MVP he could be. That said i really hope they move him to DH and morales to 1b.
JCon Posted January 17, 2017 Report Posted January 17, 2017 7 minutes ago, wbbfan said: last year was an uncharacteristic awful year. You arent paying him for last year, you are paying him for the potential MVP he could be. That said i really hope they move him to DH and morales to 1b. But his best years are behind him. It's been trending down. There's a reason that no other clubs were willing to give him a longer deal. Jays are praying that they catch lightning in a bottle. They need an angry Bautista so that's he's effective. bustamente 1
Noeller Posted January 17, 2017 Report Posted January 17, 2017 Everything about him has been declining steadily and he's getting really old now, even by baseball standards... bustamente 1
bustamente Posted January 17, 2017 Report Posted January 17, 2017 Agree with people saying that his best days are behind him, really was no interest in him at his inflated price so he took what he could get.
wbbfan Posted January 18, 2017 Report Posted January 18, 2017 1 hour ago, JCon said: But his best years are behind him. It's been trending down. There's a reason that no other clubs were willing to give him a longer deal. Jays are praying that they catch lightning in a bottle. They need an angry Bautista so that's he's effective. he was. and he is. But, old hitters who still have fast hands can still rake. Bautista's problem isnt that he has lost that trigger speed or ability to turn on a pitch. which is why there is reason to hope that he can still mash. No one was willing to give him the long term mega bucks deal. hes old. the jays are willing to give him that. he started out way too high and the market passed him by. Doesnt mean he isnt a guy more then worth having around for 1-3 years. 1 hour ago, Noeller said: Everything about him has been declining steadily and he's getting really old now, even by baseball standards... age yes, wear and tear isnt as bad as most sluggers his age. Strained shoulder/knee/toe arent the type of thing that shuts down a hitter for multiple years. And the shoulder was furthest back now. This is still a guy who hit over .800 ops last year. and well into the 900s over the previous 6. If he plays most of the season chances of him coming in .750 (which is still really good) and 30/100 are tiny. Hes perfect to have protecting josh donaldson. Hes 36 frank thomas was 38, hit .857 ops 26hr 95 rbi in 155g. Bautista hit .817 22/69 in 116g. The jays cant be done yet. But this is still a good pick up/bring back.
bearpants Posted January 19, 2017 Report Posted January 19, 2017 On 1/17/2017 at 2:50 PM, Noeller said: ...batting .200 with RISP.......$18 million bucks. Christ..... wasn't he asking for (unconfirmed) 4 years @ $25M per year mid way through last year... this signing makes sense... that's the market price for a slugger and they aren't locked in after this year if his play drops significantly...
Noeller Posted January 19, 2017 Report Posted January 19, 2017 He needs a major rebound year. The stunning thing is Atkins today saying they fully expect him to play the whole year in RF.....Christ. His defense is the fastest declining thing about his game.
wbbfan Posted January 19, 2017 Report Posted January 19, 2017 3 hours ago, Noeller said: He needs a major rebound year. The stunning thing is Atkins today saying they fully expect him to play the whole year in RF.....Christ. His defense is the fastest declining thing about his game. He was never even a great defender, he was a great arm with decent range before he started to decline. Last year he was border line a liability with the great arm. Its beyond dumb to intend to run him out every day at rf. Noeller 1
Noeller Posted January 19, 2017 Report Posted January 19, 2017 He should be DH or nothing....and even that I'm not totally sold on, but if you're gonna bring him back at all, it's only as DH. Putting him back in the field is just a recipe for failure... wbbfan and bustamente 2
wbbfan Posted January 20, 2017 Report Posted January 20, 2017 (edited) On 12/25/2016 at 5:47 PM, Jpan85 said: Same old cheap Rogers yes because 162m dollars is cheap, which is 8th highest for 2017. (thats total payroll) And they are still signing guys. Top 10 pay roll in all of baseball the previous 3 years. How do the jets compare? Previous to last year the bombers were operating considerably under the cap while teams like MTL spent like drunk sailors. Edwin also took less money then the jays offered. Edited January 20, 2017 by wbbfan
Jpan85 Posted January 20, 2017 Report Posted January 20, 2017 They could spend like the top 3 teams they choose not to.
bustamente Posted January 20, 2017 Report Posted January 20, 2017 Does anybody think that the dollar at .75 has anything to do with the payroll or does it not effect them as much i think
wbbfan Posted January 21, 2017 Report Posted January 21, 2017 3 hours ago, Jpan85 said: They could spend like the top 3 teams they choose not to. you could go out and over extend your leverage and have far fancier home, car etc too. doesnt mean its wise. Remember the jays crowds prior to this run? Or when JP first took over? Flat out the primary limiting factor on salar in recent years has NOT been rogers. Its been the jays refusal to match other teams in length of term. no one is going to take a 3-4 year deal over a 5-6+ year deal with the same pay each year. Not to mention the lack of willingness to dip into FA at the cost of draft picks under the previous regime. Plus plenty of teams have tried to buy a winner with no success. Only bankrupting their ability to draft going forward. 3 hours ago, bustamente said: Does anybody think that the dollar at .75 has anything to do with the payroll or does it not effect them as much i think No kidding. with the exchange rate the current jays salary would be 202,744,048$ over 25 million more then the current no1 highest la dodgers. Going by total pay roll instead of 25m roster pay roll they would be 5th highest in the league.
wbbfan Posted February 4, 2017 Report Posted February 4, 2017 Catchers and pitchers report for spring training on the 14th for the jays. 18th is the first work out of all jays players. JP howell, probably the best LHP out of the pen previous to last year and jarrod saltalamacchia round out the jays pick ups so far this winter. I like howell to rebound, and fit in great with our pen. Could still use another arm or two there. I like saltalamacchia as the back up catcher too. Vlady jr is up to 34th prospect in baseball. And could really shoot up this year. Sean reid foley could take a big jump in competition this year too. Though none of the top 5 are likely to be up this year or maybe early next either. Noeller 1
wbbfan Posted February 6, 2017 Report Posted February 6, 2017 Jays also now added joe smith, and suddenly the bullpen is coming together.
IC Khari Posted February 19, 2017 Report Posted February 19, 2017 Interested to see the switch hitting Morales and how he's used. Donaldson says it's going to make managing against the Blue Jays lineup tougher (not all righties) which is a good thing. This team can still hit with the best of them and considering how the pitching has come together (if it's as strong as last season) they will definitely be a contender for at least a wild card IMO.
IC Khari Posted April 6, 2017 Report Posted April 6, 2017 0 - 2 and none of the Jays big bats are hitting ... promising
Taynted_Fayth Posted April 6, 2017 Report Posted April 6, 2017 58 minutes ago, IC Khari said: 0 - 2 and none of the Jays big bats are hitting ... promising it'll come. It's not like these games were blowouts and couldn't have been won by the Jays, extra innings in game 1 and 2 costly homers given up by Happ is all it took. I agree though, need some better production at the plate. Defensively tho they look great for game 2. Loved that catch by Pillar tonight, and that diving catch by Bautista in game 1 that he got the double play out with that toss to first. IC Khari 1
Noeller Posted April 6, 2017 Report Posted April 6, 2017 pitching looks solid so far....just can't find the sticks yet, but you know that'll come eventually. Long season...
FrostyWinnipeg Posted April 6, 2017 Report Posted April 6, 2017 Maybe spin this off to Blue Jays 2017 thread or MLB 2017 thread? JCon and Noeller 2
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now