Blue-urns Posted August 22, 2015 Report Posted August 22, 2015 The only dangers I see with Hamilton is peaking too early and Austin needlessly exposing his MVP QB to possible injury. blitzmore 1
do or die Posted August 22, 2015 Report Posted August 22, 2015 Most physical team in the league.....they hit you in the mouth, for 60 minutes. Hamilton is also the best prepared team, in terms of getting out of the gate...... Blue-urns and Mark F 2
Zontar Posted August 22, 2015 Report Posted August 22, 2015 MTL and CAL dynasties had their divisions wrapped up by Labour Day some years and did just fine. Not saying HAM has anything wrapped up - just speaking to the "peak" notion
Bomber_fanaddict Posted August 22, 2015 Report Posted August 22, 2015 MTL and CAL dynasties had their divisions wrapped up by Labour Day some years and did just fine. Not saying HAM has anything wrapped up - just speaking to the "peak" notion When did Calgary ever have a dynasty? The Als from 2008-2010 maybe but I wouldn't say Cal has ever had one.
Mr Dee Posted August 22, 2015 Author Report Posted August 22, 2015 They havnt had it that easy. MIssing 5 regulars last night. And not including at least two starters on defense lost in training camp.. To suggest that havnt faced any adversity is flat out wrong. Oh please. Every team has had numerous injuries that they've had to overcome. Every team.5 of 9 teams have lost their starting QB. Hamilton has had the luxury of having turnover heaven benefit them greatly in a number of games, including 8 last night resulting in 5 TDs. They have had this 'advantage' 3 other times this year. Listen, they are a great team, coached and QB'd well, with a very good defence, but to suggest they haven't had their path made easier by other team's mistakes, is flat out wrong.
Zontar Posted August 22, 2015 Report Posted August 22, 2015 MTL and CAL dynasties had their divisions wrapped up by Labour Day some years and did just fine. Not saying HAM has anything wrapped up - just speaking to the "peak" notion When did Calgary ever have a dynasty? The Als from 2008-2010 maybe but I wouldn't say Cal has ever had one. The Flutie/Garcia/Dickenson years might qualify as one, but you know what I mean.
Zontar Posted August 22, 2015 Report Posted August 22, 2015 They havnt had it that easy. MIssing 5 regulars last night. And not including at least two starters on defense lost in training camp.. To suggest that havnt faced any adversity is flat out wrong. Oh please. Every team has had numerous injuries that they've had to overcome. Every team.5 of 9 teams have lost their starting QB. Hamilton has had the luxury of having turnover heaven benefit them greatly in a number of games, including 8 last night resulting in 5 TDs. They have had this 'advantage' 3 other times this year. Listen, they are a great team, coached and QB'd well, with a very good defence, but to suggest they haven't had their path made easier by other team's mistakes, is flat out wrong. Wont apologize for a defense generating turnovers and offenses exploiting them. It what better than average terams do. Their record has benefited from some crappy teams but thats not HAMs fault.
rebusrankin Posted August 22, 2015 Report Posted August 22, 2015 Hamilton is the best team until further notice. Their fans should start buying Grey Cup tickets. (No, Wade Miller did not ask me to post this) Bomber_fanaddict and bearpants 2
Bomber_fanaddict Posted August 22, 2015 Report Posted August 22, 2015 MTL and CAL dynasties had their divisions wrapped up by Labour Day some years and did just fine. Not saying HAM has anything wrapped up - just speaking to the "peak" notion When did Calgary ever have a dynasty? The Als from 2008-2010 maybe but I wouldn't say Cal has ever had one. The Flutie/Garcia/Dickenson years might qualify as one, but you know what I mean. I'd say the 70s Eskis and the 68-72 bombers count as dynasties. When u can constantly win cups and if ur not winning them your on the door step. Calgary has had success on and off but not for long periods IMO.
Floyd Posted August 22, 2015 Report Posted August 22, 2015 Only danger Hamilton faces is resting all their starters in the last game, getting too cocky in the playoffs... and then sleeping through the first half of the grey cup. <sobs uncontrollably>
Mark F Posted August 22, 2015 Report Posted August 22, 2015 One thing about Hamilton that's better than other teams is when the defence gets a turnover, the offence scores off of it. I wisht we were as good at that. Thought that Hamilton's receivers were off side many times, maybe I don't know what offside is or maybe it was the angle. blitzmore 1
bustamente Posted August 22, 2015 Report Posted August 22, 2015 The only way Hamilton is not in the Grey Cup this year is if Collaros gets injured and is out for the year. They play smash mouth defence, have very good special teams, are extremely well coach and create their own luck. Take Collaros out of that line up without a running game and they are an average offence at best.
DR. CFL Posted August 22, 2015 Report Posted August 22, 2015 Sadly average offence seems to have become the norm this season.
Jpan85 Posted August 22, 2015 Report Posted August 22, 2015 Wonder if anyone would give Reinbold another shot.
Brandon Posted August 22, 2015 Report Posted August 22, 2015 Collaros has like 10 steamboats before he throws it... The guy still doesn't impress me with his arm. I am happy Edmonton was destroyed.. Jones is a dink.
rebusrankin Posted August 22, 2015 Report Posted August 22, 2015 Wonder if anyone would give Reinbold another shot. Jeff "Destroyer of Franchises" Reinbold? Can I hope that on the Riders?
iso_55 Posted August 22, 2015 Report Posted August 22, 2015 Yeah, TSN... yapping with Makowsky & suddenly the Riders score a TD. Like WTF??? They FORGOT to mention the Stamps interception was overturned. What a bunch of ****. Mark F and kelownabomberfan 2
iso_55 Posted August 22, 2015 Report Posted August 22, 2015 TSN is just a crappy network. kelownabomberfan 1
iso_55 Posted August 22, 2015 Report Posted August 22, 2015 Blah, blah, blah, blah Makowsky... Mark F 1
Mark F Posted August 22, 2015 Report Posted August 22, 2015 great coverage, last play I saw was int in the end zone, then makcowski ,then sask scores .
Mark F Posted August 22, 2015 Report Posted August 22, 2015 ten times as much coverage as makoski got in his entire career
kelownabomberfan Posted August 22, 2015 Report Posted August 22, 2015 MTL and CAL dynasties had their divisions wrapped up by Labour Day some years and did just fine. Not saying HAM has anything wrapped up - just speaking to the "peak" notionWhen did Calgary ever have a dynasty? The Als from 2008-2010 maybe but I wouldn't say Cal has ever had one. The Flutie/Garcia/Dickenson years might qualify as one, but you know what I mean.I'd say the 70s Eskis and the 68-72 bombers count as dynasties. When u can constantly win cups and if ur not winning them your on the door step. Calgary has had success on and off but not for long periods IMO. I think you are a decade early on the Esks and a decade late on the Bombers.
iso_55 Posted August 22, 2015 Report Posted August 22, 2015 great coverage, last play I saw was int in the end zone, then makcowski ,then sask scores . great coverage, last play I saw was int in the end zone, then makcowski ,then sask scores . ****, absolute ****.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now