Noeller Posted September 2, 2015 Report Posted September 2, 2015 I'll bet Brohm starts and actually surprises some people. LOL. I can see it happening to be honest, Brohm starts and we actually win. This forum then explodes and who knows what happens... I dunno, but i do get the feeling that Brohm will start and honestly for some dumb reason, I don't think he will be as awful has Marve has been but if we lose and Brohm starts, there will be people asking why Marve didn't play even though he basically has looked terrible the last game a half really.Actually I agree with you MOS may just go with Brohm they are probably practicing scooping the ball off the turf as we speak. Whole new meaning to hit the turf! Can you say rug burn?Brohm was decent vs Calgary last year until he got hurt. I'm not sticking up for him but really give him the reps and see what he does with it.And that's still the only time he had starters reps for a week of practice, right? Every other time he's played, he came in cold off the bench... SPuDS and Goalie 2
Guest J5V Posted September 2, 2015 Report Posted September 2, 2015 Holly overreaction Batman. Walker was brought in for depth and for his CFL experience. If Marshall goes done it will be nice to have at least 1 experienced back. You guys make me laugh, or is it cry. if the back is experienced but not good enough is it worth it? I'd rather try a rookie out. That's how we got Marshall. If you keep using retreads you'll never find any good rookies. At this time of year especially you should be bringing in rookies for a look see unless you're planning on going deep in the playoffs and want that veteran insurance policy.I truly believe Walters and O'Shea are still pushing for a Grey Cup run this season.
wbbfan Posted September 2, 2015 Report Posted September 2, 2015 Remember when we refused to sign Messam when he was free? I love his talent, and would have taken him at that point. But with the issues hes had in the locker room i cant blame any one for passing on him.
rebusrankin Posted September 2, 2015 Report Posted September 2, 2015 At times, it feels like the club is a dining establishment in an all inclusive. They have your cash, so they feel free to **** on your plate.
iso_55 Posted September 2, 2015 Report Posted September 2, 2015 Why are we not signing qbs? Like WTF is going on???
CodyT Posted September 2, 2015 Report Posted September 2, 2015 I'm not against bringing in walker. I thought I read in the paper CFL gms criticized the bombers offence for not having enough speed. There's some speed. There's no downside to this move B-F-F-C 1
bearpants Posted September 2, 2015 Report Posted September 2, 2015 Why are we not signing qbs? Like WTF is going on??? We currently have 5, including Willy... and that's also assuming you consider Brohm a QB...
Logan007 Posted September 2, 2015 Report Posted September 2, 2015 We have 5? Who's the one I'm missing? Willy, Marve, Brohm, Davis and?
Jesse Posted September 2, 2015 Report Posted September 2, 2015 We have 5? Who's the one I'm missing? Willy, Marve, Brohm, Davis and? I believe his name is Tyler Russell.
Logan007 Posted September 2, 2015 Report Posted September 2, 2015 Ah ok. Don't remember reading about him. Or I was so uninterested in the news that I forgot about it. bearpants 1
IC Khari Posted September 2, 2015 Report Posted September 2, 2015 Holly overreaction Batman. Walker was brought in for depth and for his CFL experience. If Marshall goes done it will be nice to have at least 1 experienced back. You guys make me laugh, or is it cry. if the back is experienced but not good enough is it worth it? I'd rather try a rookie out. That's how we got Marshall. If you keep using retreads you'll never find any good rookies. At this time of year especially you should be bringing in rookies for a look see unless you're planning on going deep in the playoffs and want that veteran insurance policy.I truly believe Walters and O'Shea are still pushing for a Grey Cup run this season.
Booch Posted September 2, 2015 Report Posted September 2, 2015 Why are we not signing qbs? Like WTF is going on??? Mainly because signing a QB off the street, not a retread CFL cast-off would serve us no use whatsoever this year for at least a month or so...we gotta go to the dance with whom we brought now. A revamping of the offensive philosophy is whats needed
gbill2004 Posted September 2, 2015 Report Posted September 2, 2015 Max Hall wouldn't be a bad option right now, assuming he's recovered from his drug addiction.
TBURGESS Posted September 2, 2015 Report Posted September 2, 2015 I don't care who we start at QB this week, just make the decision now and give him most of the reps this week. Splitting the reps just gives both QB's an extra excuse for not doing their jobs. Noeller 1
Floyd Posted September 2, 2015 Report Posted September 2, 2015 Going to be a big mistake if Walker gets the majority of touches over Marshall...
bearpants Posted September 2, 2015 Report Posted September 2, 2015 Going to be a big mistake if Walker gets the majority of touches over Marshall... I agree with whoever mentioned (probably in this thread) that we're using them backwards... it needs to be Marshall getting the bulk of carries to wear down the D... then Walker coming in to hit them with the change of pace...
Goalie Posted September 2, 2015 Report Posted September 2, 2015 Well, Thunder usually does occur before Lightning, last time i checked at least lol... few nights ago really
Atomic Posted September 2, 2015 Report Posted September 2, 2015 Well, Thunder usually does occur before Lightning, last time i checked at least lol... few nights ago really You failed science class didn't you? BigBlueFanatic, Logan007 and sweep the leg 3
sweep the leg Posted September 2, 2015 Report Posted September 2, 2015 An argument can be made either way for how to use the rbs. Tackling gets harder when you're tired. Bringing down a beast like Marshall when he's fresh and you've tired can't be easy. Marshall was pretty successful earlier this season when he was coming in after Cotton. Make them chase the fast guy early and run them over with the big guy late. Makes as much sense as the opposite.
kelownabomberfan Posted September 2, 2015 Report Posted September 2, 2015 Well, Thunder usually does occur before Lightning, last time i checked at least lol... few nights ago really You failed science class didn't you? or Einstein was horribly wrong. Logan007 1
JuranBoldenRules Posted September 2, 2015 Report Posted September 2, 2015 I'm not against bringing in walker. I thought I read in the paper CFL gms criticized the bombers offence for not having enough speed. There's some speed. There's no downside to this move The downside is taking a roster spot from someone who might actually be a good player. Romby Bryant was here for his speed last year too, Walker is basically the Romby Bryant of running backs, minus actually having any sustained success in the league.
WBBFanWest Posted September 2, 2015 Report Posted September 2, 2015 Well, Thunder usually does occur before Lightning, last time i checked at least lol... few nights ago really You've really got to start wearing a helmet and cage when you play. On second thought, it's probably a little late, so go nuts and continue making those saves with the top of your melon!
Tracker Posted September 3, 2015 Report Posted September 3, 2015 Walker is quick, i'll give him that, and he even caught a few passes, but in all of his gallops, he didn't have to break any arm tackles or any sort.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now