deflated balls Posted September 7, 2015 Report Posted September 7, 2015 ? I only ask the question because should we be investing more money on the defence? I don't think Ray would help this team at all. Seriously! Have you been watching the team this year? Willy cant be depended on to play 18 games in a season. But again the point of the post is should we be spending probably $250,000on a defensive player. So you think putting an aging QB that has missed large chunks of two of the last three years because of injury behind this putrid o-line would improve the situation? Ray would need to be scraped off the turf within a game or two! Read the bolded section please. One player figures to have a long career anchoring the defense and the other will be retiring in the next year or two. Rather obvious don't you think?
Blueandgold Posted September 7, 2015 Report Posted September 7, 2015 If price was the same. Would you take Henoc Muamba or Ricky Ray? I only ask the question because should we be investing more money on the defence? Henoc without a shadow of a doubt.
Jacquie Posted September 7, 2015 Report Posted September 7, 2015 If price was the same. Would you take Henoc Muamba or Ricky Ray? I only ask the question because should we be investing more money on the defence? I don't think Ray would help this team at all. Seriously! Have you been watching the team this year? Willy cant be depended on to play 18 games in a season. But again the point of the post is should we be spending probably $250,000on a defensive player. Ray has missed around 20 games due to injury since 2012. As for spending that much for a defensive player, Henoc is worth it.
gbill2004 Posted September 7, 2015 Author Report Posted September 7, 2015 Darren Cameron just re-tweeted this old Henoc tweet: @HenocMuamba: S/o to all my fans in winnipeg. Still get love from there! #Grateful Bigblue204 and SPuDS 2
B-F-F-C Posted September 7, 2015 Report Posted September 7, 2015 lawless tweeted that Muamba will work out for the Giants.
Dirty30 Posted September 7, 2015 Report Posted September 7, 2015 Did Matthews make the Seahawks? Haven't heard or seen anything on him.
Brandon Blue&Gold Posted September 7, 2015 Report Posted September 7, 2015 Did Matthews make the Seahawks? Haven't heard or seen anything on him. He made their 53 man roster.
iso_55 Posted September 7, 2015 Report Posted September 7, 2015 With almost the entire second half of the season remaining, only one team in the league has less than a million dollars to spend. Not exactly money well spent...... From CFLCapGeek: Win $945K Mon $1,253M Tor $1,398M Sas $1,533M Ott $1,564M Ham $1,699M Cal $1,800M Edm $1,975M BC $2,127M That's what I saw...
Atomic Posted September 7, 2015 Report Posted September 7, 2015 With almost the entire second half of the season remaining, only one team in the league has less than a million dollars to spend. Not exactly money well spent...... From CFLCapGeek: Win $945K Mon $1,253M Tor $1,398M Sas $1,533M Ott $1,564M Ham $1,699M Cal $1,800M Edm $1,975M BC $2,127M That's what I saw... CFL capgeek is a total joke. People need to stop citing it. It is not even close to accurate. Goalie 1
bb1 Posted September 7, 2015 Report Posted September 7, 2015 Hmm I wonder even though he is hurt wouldn't it make more sense to throw that cash after Bret Jones?
Goalie Posted September 7, 2015 Report Posted September 7, 2015 If Jones actually becomes available I think we might go after him too. Ben Henan too. Where is this myth that you can't have more than a couple players making big money coming from. But I think Jones and heenan are more off season type signings.
deflated balls Posted September 7, 2015 Report Posted September 7, 2015 Actually, the site is quite useful. Spoke to Wally Buono about it last month and he admitted it was indeed fairly accurate, although not precise. Best tool available to gauge spending, that I'm aware of at least. *edited to correct typo
brett_c_b Posted September 7, 2015 Report Posted September 7, 2015 With almost the entire second half of the season remaining, only one team in the league has less than a million dollars to spend. Not exactly money well spent...... From CFLCapGeek: Win $945K Mon $1,253M Tor $1,398M Sas $1,533M Ott $1,564M Ham $1,699M Cal $1,800M Edm $1,975M BC $2,127M That's what I saw... please stop with this garbage ISO, you've mentioned it 10 times, and every time it's pointed out it's horribly wrong. So going by that data we should hire Edmonton's GM, as Mike Reilly is the only guy on their team making over $100,000. We need that negotiator to get 90% of our team on league minimum contracts. BC doesn't pay any national player more than 71k. We get that you love everything Stampeders and hate everything Bombers, but at least try hate the Bombers for legitimate reasons. Hell according to that site Cornish is the only National player Calgary pays above league minimum. If anyone wants an excel file of all the data from that site pm me and I'll e-mail it to you so you can see for yourself how incomplete it is. It's basically their website but in excel. Now i'm looking at their sourcing for the sourced contracts. So Zach Anderson is listed at $51,000 and sourced. The source is an old cjob article saying he signed, but no reference to salary. So even when they say a contract is sourced it's a joke.
Mike Posted September 7, 2015 Report Posted September 7, 2015 Actually, the site is quite useful. Spoke to Wally Buono about it last year and he admitted it was indeed fairly accurate, although not precise. Best tool available to gauge spending, that I'm aware of at least. That's interesting, seen as how it didn't exist last year. blueandgoldguy, sweep the leg, bigg jay and 2 others 5
Brandon Posted September 7, 2015 Report Posted September 7, 2015 Winnipeg has no super stars while other teams have a tonne of them..yet we have the least cap space.
WBBFanWest Posted September 7, 2015 Report Posted September 7, 2015 I remember talking with Bud Grant back in the 60's about it. His reply was "What the hell is an internet?". Fatty Liver, bearpants, rebusrankin and 3 others 6
deflated balls Posted September 7, 2015 Report Posted September 7, 2015 Actually, the site is quite useful. Spoke to Wally Buono about it last year and he admitted it was indeed fairly accurate, although not precise. Best tool available to gauge spending, that I'm aware of at least. That's interesting, seen as how it didn't exist last year. Sorry, should have said month not year. My apologies.
WBBFanWest Posted September 7, 2015 Report Posted September 7, 2015 Ya, I can see how you can easily confuse when you last talked with Buono. I do it all the time. Floyd and SPuDS 2
brett_c_b Posted September 7, 2015 Report Posted September 7, 2015 Actually, the site is quite useful. Spoke to Wally Buono about it last year and he admitted it was indeed fairly accurate, although not precise. Best tool available to gauge spending, that I'm aware of at least. That's interesting, seen as how it didn't exist last year. Sorry, should have said month not year. My apologies. So Wally Buono thinks this is accurate Name Year Team Pos Imp Salary Adekolu, Stephen 2015 BC WR NAT 51,000 Aladenoye, Josh 2015 BC OL INT 51,000 Arakgi, Jason 2015 BC LB NAT 51,000 Arceneaux, Emmanuel 2015 BC WR INT 51,000 Bazzie, Alex 2015 BC DL INT 51,000 Beck, John 2015 BC QB INT 51,000 Benson, Mike 2015 BC LS NAT 51,000 Bighill, Adam 2015 BC LB INT 51,000 Brooks, Michael 2015 BC DL INT 51,000 Burnham, Bryan 2015 BC WR INT 51,000 Clarke, Steven 2015 BC DB INT 51,000 Collie, Austin 2015 BC WR NAT 51,000 Dickson, JoJo 2015 BC LB INT 51,000 Fabien, Kirby 2015 BC OL NAT 51,000 Foster, Jason 2015 BC OL INT 51,000 Fraser, Eric 2015 BC DB NAT 51,000 Gore, Shawn 2015 BC WR NAT 51,000 Harris, Andrew 2015 BC RB NAT 51,000 Hawkins, Lavelle 2015 BC WR INT 51,000 Hoffman-Ellis, Alex 2015 BC LB INT 51,000 Iannuzzi, Marco 2015 BC WR NAT 51,000 Jackson, Tim 2015 BC DL INT 51,000 Jennings, Jonathon 2015 BC QB INT 51,000 Johnson, Josh 2015 BC DB INT 51,000 Lee, T.J. 2015 BC DB INT 51,000 Leone, Richie 2015 BC K INT 51,000 Lochard, Pascal 2015 BC RB NAT 51,000 Lokombo, Bo 2015 BC LB NAT 51,000 Lulay, Travis 2015 BC QB INT 325,000 Lumbala, Rolly 2015 BC FB NAT 51,000 Menard, David 2015 BC DL NAT 51,000 Minter, Zach 2015 BC DL INT 51,000 Murray-Lawrence, Shaquille 2015 BC RB NAT 51,000 Olafioye, Jovan 2015 BC OL INT 51,000 Parker, Keynan 2015 BC DB NAT 51,000 Phillips, Ryan 2015 BC DB INT 51,000 Player, T-Dre 2015 BC OL NAT 51,000 Rainey, Chris 2015 BC RB INT 51,000 Roh, Craig 2015 BC DL INT 51,000 Rwabukamba, Chris 2015 BC DB NAT 51,000 Smith, Khreem 2015 BC DL INT 51,000 Taylor, Courtney 2015 BC WR INT 51,000 Thorn, Cameron 2015 BC OL NAT 51,000 Valli, Dean 2015 BC OL NAT 51,000 Westerman, Jabar 2015 BC DL NAT 51,000 Yell, Ronnie 2015 BC DB INT 51,000 Before hitting post that showed as a nice table. Spoiler: Lulay is the only active lion making more than league minimum.
iso_55 Posted September 7, 2015 Report Posted September 7, 2015 With almost the entire second half of the season remaining, only one team in the league has less than a million dollars to spend. Not exactly money well spent...... From CFLCapGeek: Win $945K Mon $1,253M Tor $1,398M Sas $1,533M Ott $1,564M Ham $1,699M Cal $1,800M Edm $1,975M BC $2,127M That's what I saw... please stop with this garbage ISO, you've mentioned it 10 times, and every time it's pointed out it's horribly wrong. So going by that data we should hire Edmonton's GM, as Mike Reilly is the only guy on their team making over $100,000. We need that negotiator to get 90% of our team on league minimum contracts. BC doesn't pay any national player more than 71k. We get that you love everything Stampeders and hate everything Bombers, but at least try hate the Bombers for legitimate reasons. Hell according to that site Cornish is the only National player Calgary pays above league minimum. If anyone wants an excel file of all the data from that site pm me and I'll e-mail it to you so you can see for yourself how incomplete it is. It's basically their website but in excel. Now i'm looking at their sourcing for the sourced contracts. So Zach Anderson is listed at $51,000 and sourced. The source is an old cjob article saying he signed, but no reference to salary. So even when they say a contract is sourced it's a joke. You know, I don't know how accurate the website is. They published the salaries & I posted what I saw. And I don't love the Stamps & hate the Bombers or I wouldn't be here you ass.
deflated balls Posted September 7, 2015 Report Posted September 7, 2015 Ya, I can see how you can easily confuse when you last talked with Buono. I do it all the time. I'm sure you have never input the wrong word while typing in your life, right?
brett_c_b Posted September 7, 2015 Report Posted September 7, 2015 With almost the entire second half of the season remaining, only one team in the league has less than a million dollars to spend. Not exactly money well spent...... From CFLCapGeek: Win $945K Mon $1,253M Tor $1,398M Sas $1,533M Ott $1,564M Ham $1,699M Cal $1,800M Edm $1,975M BC $2,127M That's what I saw... please stop with this garbage ISO, you've mentioned it 10 times, and every time it's pointed out it's horribly wrong. So going by that data we should hire Edmonton's GM, as Mike Reilly is the only guy on their team making over $100,000. We need that negotiator to get 90% of our team on league minimum contracts. BC doesn't pay any national player more than 71k. We get that you love everything Stampeders and hate everything Bombers, but at least try hate the Bombers for legitimate reasons. Hell according to that site Cornish is the only National player Calgary pays above league minimum. If anyone wants an excel file of all the data from that site pm me and I'll e-mail it to you so you can see for yourself how incomplete it is. It's basically their website but in excel. Now i'm looking at their sourcing for the sourced contracts. So Zach Anderson is listed at $51,000 and sourced. The source is an old cjob article saying he signed, but no reference to salary. So even when they say a contract is sourced it's a joke. You say the website is a joke? That is your opinion. Yes, I already acknowledged some of the contracts may be wrong but I think overall as a guide it may be somewhat accurate. What about it is accurate? If i filter on active players it comes up with 415. 359 of which make league minimum salary. So 87% of the league makes minimum salary?
Mike Posted September 7, 2015 Report Posted September 7, 2015 Fact is, the site is garbage. It's even more useless because it enables fans to create a fictitious argument. I would estimate roughly 10% of the information they have listed is even somewhat correct. There's no point to sourcing it. SPuDS 1
WBBFanWest Posted September 7, 2015 Report Posted September 7, 2015 Ya, I can see how you can easily confuse when you last talked with Buono. I do it all the time. I'm sure you have never input the wrong word while typing in your life, right? Sorry, but I not never make mistakes. SPuDS 1
iso_55 Posted September 7, 2015 Report Posted September 7, 2015 Well, I would hope we have the money to go after some of the NFL FA's that are now available. Any one of them would help us immensely.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now