TrueBlue Posted September 15, 2015 Report Posted September 15, 2015 Actually it is. GMs shuffle money around all the time from one position group to another. You don't think that Huff has a little less in one position group or had to release a higher paid player because he pays Tate more than any backup QB in the league? Or that Taman had to release some players because he signed Kevin Glenn? Not saying its definitely a situation Walters is dealing with but is a potential situation a GM might face... I think the way your question was given as a "if you were the GM..." is what is the issue. You could get the same answers from people if it was something like "What signing do you think would have more of an impact?" bearpants and Noeller 2
gbill2004 Posted September 15, 2015 Author Report Posted September 15, 2015 Actually it is. GMs shuffle money around all the time from one position group to another. You don't think that Huff has a little less in one position group or had to release a higher paid player because he pays Tate more than any backup QB in the league? Or that Taman had to release some players because he signed Kevin Glenn? Not saying its definitely a situation Walters is dealing with but is a potential situation a GM might face... I think the way your question was given as a "if you were the GM..." is what is the issue. You could get the same answers from people if it was something like "What signing do you think would have more of an impact?" Thanks Mr. Professor...you're so smart! Atomic 1
Floyd Posted September 15, 2015 Report Posted September 15, 2015 Are there any actual football threads left on this forum or just arguments about grammar and etiquette
Mike Posted September 15, 2015 Report Posted September 15, 2015 Actually it is. GMs shuffle money around all the time from one position group to another. You don't think that Huff has a little less in one position group or had to release a higher paid player because he pays Tate more than any backup QB in the league? Or that Taman had to release some players because he signed Kevin Glenn? Not saying its definitely a situation Walters is dealing with but is a potential situation a GM might face...I think the way your question was given as a "if you were the GM..." is what is the issue. You could get the same answers from people if it was something like "What signing do you think would have more of an impact?" Thanks Mr. Professor...you're so smart! Taking constructive responses from someone and mocking them for it. Man, you really know how to do it all don't you. SPuDS 1
Logan007 Posted September 15, 2015 Report Posted September 15, 2015 If you were GM, would you rather: 1) Have a poop every morning or 2) Go watch a pre-screening of Star Wars: The Force Awakens Floyd 1
TrueBlue Posted September 15, 2015 Report Posted September 15, 2015 Actually it is. GMs shuffle money around all the time from one position group to another. You don't think that Huff has a little less in one position group or had to release a higher paid player because he pays Tate more than any backup QB in the league? Or that Taman had to release some players because he signed Kevin Glenn? Not saying its definitely a situation Walters is dealing with but is a potential situation a GM might face... I think the way your question was given as a "if you were the GM..." is what is the issue. You could get the same answers from people if it was something like "What signing do you think would have more of an impact?" Thanks Mr. Professor...you're so smart! Feel free to keep defending your thread, that's fun too.
gbill2004 Posted September 15, 2015 Author Report Posted September 15, 2015 Actually it is. GMs shuffle money around all the time from one position group to another. You don't think that Huff has a little less in one position group or had to release a higher paid player because he pays Tate more than any backup QB in the league? Or that Taman had to release some players because he signed Kevin Glenn? Not saying its definitely a situation Walters is dealing with but is a potential situation a GM might face... I think the way your question was given as a "if you were the GM..." is what is the issue. You could get the same answers from people if it was something like "What signing do you think would have more of an impact?" Thanks Mr. Professor...you're so smart! Feel free to keep defending your thread, that's fun too. It passes the time...
gbill2004 Posted September 15, 2015 Author Report Posted September 15, 2015 If you were GM, would you rather: 1) Have a poop every morning or 2) Go watch a pre-screening of Star Wars: The Force Awakens I'll take the poop.
Noeller Posted September 15, 2015 Report Posted September 15, 2015 Actually it is. GMs shuffle money around all the time from one position group to another. You don't think that Huff has a little less in one position group or had to release a higher paid player because he pays Tate more than any backup QB in the league? Or that Taman had to release some players because he signed Kevin Glenn? Not saying its definitely a situation Walters is dealing with but is a potential situation a GM might face... I think the way your question was given as a "if you were the GM..." is what is the issue. You could get the same answers from people if it was something like "What signing do you think would have more of an impact?"Thanks Mr. Professor...you're so smart! Taking constructive responses from someone and mocking them for it. Man, you really know how to do it all don't you. Remember, this is the guy who cried because he felt we weren't thanking him enough for his Training Camp reports. You can't win with some people. I thought True Blue's post was dead on...the wording is what caused the backlash. bigg jay 1
gbill2004 Posted September 15, 2015 Author Report Posted September 15, 2015 Actually it is. GMs shuffle money around all the time from one position group to another. You don't think that Huff has a little less in one position group or had to release a higher paid player because he pays Tate more than any backup QB in the league? Or that Taman had to release some players because he signed Kevin Glenn? Not saying its definitely a situation Walters is dealing with but is a potential situation a GM might face... I think the way your question was given as a "if you were the GM..." is what is the issue. You could get the same answers from people if it was something like "What signing do you think would have more of an impact?"Thanks Mr. Professor...you're so smart! Taking constructive responses from someone and mocking them for it. Man, you really know how to do it all don't you. Remember, this is the guy who cried because he felt we weren't thanking him enough for his Training Camp reports. You can't win with some people. I thought True Blue's post was dead on...the wording is what caused the backlash. Wow...I think you might be even smarter than True Blue!
Atomic Posted September 15, 2015 Report Posted September 15, 2015 Would someone just tell gbill his thread is fantastic so we can move on? Floyd, sweep the leg, Brandon Blue&Gold and 5 others 8
gbill2004 Posted September 15, 2015 Author Report Posted September 15, 2015 Would someone just tell gbill his thread is fantastic so we can move on? I think it might be time to shut this thread down. Too many d-bags ruined this one. Poll results are interesting and when you shuffle through the d-bag comments, there was some interesting discussion...
bigg jay Posted September 15, 2015 Report Posted September 15, 2015 If you were GM, would you rather: 1) Have a poop every morning or 2) Go watch a pre-screening of Star Wars: The Force Awakens #2 and it's not even close! Brandon Blue&Gold 1
gbill2004 Posted September 15, 2015 Author Report Posted September 15, 2015 If you were GM, would you rather: 1) Have a poop every morning or 2) Go watch a pre-screening of Star Wars: The Force Awakens #2 and it's not even close! If you choose #2 does it mean you never get to poop again?
bigg jay Posted September 15, 2015 Report Posted September 15, 2015 I'm assuming that choosing #2 means you just can't poop every morning. It's really poorly worded though (lots of that going on apparently) so who knows? Brandon Blue&Gold 1
gbill2004 Posted September 15, 2015 Author Report Posted September 15, 2015 I'm assuming that choosing #2 means you just can't poop every morning. It's really poorly worded though (lots of that going on apparently) so who knows? Yep we better form a committee and help give advice on re-writing the question because we're far superior and know everything there is to know about life.
Rich Posted September 15, 2015 Report Posted September 15, 2015 I think this has run its course SPuDS 1
Recommended Posts