The Unknown Poster Posted February 15, 2016 Author Report Posted February 15, 2016 What a disaster this could be for the Lightening.
Ducky Posted February 15, 2016 Report Posted February 15, 2016 Maybe Stamkos will re-sign... Everyone is assuming he is moving to a different team.
Brandon Posted February 15, 2016 Report Posted February 15, 2016 Jets will sign him!!! STAMKOS TIME!!!
Floyd Posted February 15, 2016 Report Posted February 15, 2016 31 minutes ago, Brandon said: Jets will sign him!!! STAMKOS TIME!!! Cant do it, need to save that capspace to re-sign Ladd and lock up Burmi. Ducky 1
bustamente Posted February 15, 2016 Report Posted February 15, 2016 Tampa rolling the dice but Stamkos forced there hand by stating that he would refuse any trade, lots of cap trouble for Tampa if they sign Stamkos and don't front load it and even if they do lots of RFA and UFA contracts coming up.
The Unknown Poster Posted February 16, 2016 Author Report Posted February 16, 2016 If Stamkos won't waive his NMC and walks away he's a classless piece of garbage.
Floyd Posted February 16, 2016 Report Posted February 16, 2016 10 minutes ago, The Unknown Poster said: If Stamkos won't waive his NMC and walks away he's a classless piece of garbage. Because he negotiated a fair contract with his employer and then they asked him to change the terms in the final year...? sweep the leg, Ducky and Rich 3
bustamente Posted February 16, 2016 Report Posted February 16, 2016 14 minutes ago, Floyd said: Because he negotiated a fair contract with his employer and then they asked him to change the terms in the final year...? Stamkos feels that they have a good chance to win and doesn't want to leave this year, i get it but how would you feel if Ladd refused a trade and left at the end of the season and we got nothing in return.
The Unknown Poster Posted February 16, 2016 Author Report Posted February 16, 2016 (edited) 19 minutes ago, Floyd said: Because he negotiated a fair contract with his employer and then they asked him to change the terms in the final year...? Yeah uh huh if you don't know why there is no reason to explain. Sorry it went over your head. The nhl needs to mandate NMC out of contracts in the final year. The argument a player wants to do the best for the team is a lie. And that's what makes him classless. There I explained it. Edited February 16, 2016 by The Unknown Poster FrostyWinnipeg 1
Goalie Posted February 16, 2016 Report Posted February 16, 2016 Scuderi will clear cuz he's awful and overpaid The Unknown Poster 1
Jimmy Pop Posted February 16, 2016 Report Posted February 16, 2016 Hawks clearing space to make room for Ladd?
kelownabomberfan Posted February 16, 2016 Report Posted February 16, 2016 clear space for Enstrom too!
FrostyWinnipeg Posted February 16, 2016 Report Posted February 16, 2016 5 minutes ago, Jimmy Pop said: Hawks clearing space to make room for Ladd? Clearing out a 37 year old to make room for a broom and a mop.
Goalie Posted February 16, 2016 Report Posted February 16, 2016 Jets could retain on Ladd. Best guess... he's on waivers cuz he sucks
The Unknown Poster Posted February 16, 2016 Author Report Posted February 16, 2016 34 minutes ago, Jimmy Pop said: Hawks clearing space to make room for Ladd? Our friend Eklund seems to think so. And sooner rather than later!
Goalie Posted February 16, 2016 Report Posted February 16, 2016 (edited) Eklund is a huge joke. He is such a joke that years ago he was on a USA based trade center show. He was such a gong show he wasn't invited back. 2 minutes after he says he's heard that ryan Smyth and the oilers have agreed to a contract extension... Smyth was traded. That whole show had many more instances of what he said the opposite happened. Heck man. Eklund isn't even the guys real name. Edited February 16, 2016 by Goalie
Goalie Posted February 16, 2016 Report Posted February 16, 2016 (edited) With that said tho... I do think Chicago is Ladds likely destination. I'm not sure for what .... a 1st is guaranteed but not sure who the prospect or player coming this way would be. 1st and Andrew Shaw would be nice but doubtful. Hopefully a D prospect like Pokka or Svedberg Edited February 16, 2016 by Goalie
Ducky Posted February 16, 2016 Report Posted February 16, 2016 1st and Dano sounds nice but I think he ends up in Florida and signs long term.
The Unknown Poster Posted February 16, 2016 Author Report Posted February 16, 2016 34 minutes ago, Goalie said: Eklund is a huge joke. He is such a joke that years ago he was on a USA based trade center show. He was such a gong show he wasn't invited back. 2 minutes after he says he's heard that ryan Smyth and the oilers have agreed to a contract extension... Smyth was traded. That whole show had many more instances of what he said the opposite happened. Heck man. Eklund isn't even the guys real name. I know. I like to post his name because someone always explodes when I do. But realistically, you agree with him!
bustamente Posted February 16, 2016 Report Posted February 16, 2016 Heard that Chicago is not interested in giving up a first round this year as they need to build up prospects for what it's worth.
Goalie Posted February 16, 2016 Report Posted February 16, 2016 Dano makes no sense at all. We are loaded with forward prospects
FrostyWinnipeg Posted February 16, 2016 Report Posted February 16, 2016 Really don't see CHI needing a player like Ladd. Wash/Fla/St. L do.
Goalie Posted February 17, 2016 Report Posted February 17, 2016 Chicago is Ladds likely destination. It is what it is. We willsee what what get back
Noeller Posted February 17, 2016 Report Posted February 17, 2016 The thing about trading with Chicago is, if you're getting a prospect back, you know the odds are good that you're going to get a high quality player. Those guys can scout.....
Recommended Posts