Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

So FanWest....I guess with his "resignation" the Club had no further financial obligation to Butchko? Play the semantics game all you want. Walk the blank get pushed off the blank. Whatever you choose to call it in the business world it is about mitigating costs and saving face.

Posted

So FanWest....I guess with his "resignation" the Club had no further financial obligation to Butchko? Play the semantics game all you want. Walk the blank get pushed off the blank. Whatever you choose to call it in the business world it is about mitigating costs and saving face.

I would suspect that Buchko, like most executives, would have a clause in their contract which gives them a buyout upon leaving the organization.  The only exception to that, normally,  is when someone is released for cause (ie. they broke the law, repeated violated company policy etc.).  So in pretty much most other instances, the CEO gets a package when they leave.  Sorry to disappoint, but in the business world, they usually try to keep the humiliation and drama that you seem to desperately crave to a minimum.  Makes hiring the next guy a whole lot easier.

Posted

Should have gone for "cause" incompetence. Well the sad part is the Bombers were once considered one of the model organizations in the CFL. How the mighty have fallen. I don't crave drama we are simply sinking in a quagmire of it.

Posted

Should have gone for "cause" incompetence. Well the sad part is the Bombers were once considered one of the model organizations in the CFL. How the mighty have fallen. I don't crave drama we are simply sinking in a quagmire of it.

lol, when was that the 1950 - 60's?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...