Jump to content

Donald Trump

Blueballz

By Blueballz
in General Discussion

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 979
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

Rich
Rich

Election is over, thread locked.   I'm sure this will get picked up in a new thread at some point Have let a lot go in this thread, probably more than we should have.  Politics can be a rather pa

sweep the leg
sweep the leg

What on tv is a legitimate news source now though? In the age of twitter people aren't going to sit at home and watch cspan. Fox & CNN are comedy networks too, just not "ha ha" funny. Jon Ste

Mark H.
Mark H.

Y'all sure seem to enjoy wallowing in the cesspool of each others' political views. 

FrostyWinnipeg Grand Master

FrostyWinnipeg

Posted
Posted (edited)
29 minutes ago, HardCoreBlue said:

Ralph Nader missed his chance. :-) 

Mitt would have beat Hillary. Not many quality candidates for Repubs this year. Kasich maybe best of bunch although Christie was only one who believed in globe warming.

Edited by FrostyWinnipeg
kelownabomberfan Grand Master

kelownabomberfan

Posted
Posted
9 minutes ago, FrostyWinnipeg said:

Mitt would have beat Hillary. Not many quality candidates for Repubs this year. Kasich maybe best of bunch although Christie was only one who believed in globe warming.

Say what you need to say about the man-made climate change myth and then do another when elected. 

Mark H. Grand Master

Mark H.

Posted
Posted
On October 22, 2016 at 2:27 PM, kelownabomberfan said:

Image

Trump is rude and doesn't have a statesman like bone in his entire body. As for his brain - let's not even go there. 

The Unknown Poster Newbie

The Unknown Poster

Posted
Posted

Trump's campaign manager admitted they are behind.  Which sucks.  Because one of the most entertaining things is watching her spin all the bad news into good news and failing miserably.  Trump seems to be admitting he has wasted his energy too.  Seems resigned to the inevitable outcome.

But even Trump's manager seems to have a bad case of sore loser-itis.  Saying Hilary is ahead because of her "advantages" in having Bill & Obama campaigning for her.  Well...if everyone hated Bill and Obama as much as Trump's campaign said, then that shouldnt be helping.

So presuming Trump loses, what do people think he does on election night? 

do or die Grand Master

do or die

Posted
Posted

It is shameful that in the end......the Clinton's, Obama, the media, pollsters, Mexicans, former beauty contestants, all GOP mainstream leaders, Google, 50 State election commissions, all 3 debate moderators, everybody at the Al Smith Dinner, and a host of various nasty women from around the country.........have all conspired to rig the deck and deny this man, what is rightfully his......

Clear as day.....at least to Trump Nation.

 

Rich Mentor

Rich

Posted
Posted
9 minutes ago, kelownabomberfan said:

Has sex with his super-model wife on a giant golden bed.  Pretty much like every other night.

I was reading an article the other day that theorised that if Trump loses, he would divorce Melania as she has reached the age where Trump usually starts looking for someone new.  Speculating that he has just been waiting for the election to be over for "optics".

 

The Unknown Poster Newbie

The Unknown Poster

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, Rich said:

I was reading an article the other day that theorised that if Trump loses, he would divorce Melania as she has reached the age where Trump usually starts looking for someone new.  Speculating that he has just been waiting for the election to be over for "optics".

 

I saw an article that speculated she might want out now that all his and behaviour has come to light. 

kelownabomberfan Grand Master

kelownabomberfan

Posted
Posted (edited)
 

"The White House is like a subway. You have to put in coins to open the gates."

Such were the immortal words of one Johnny Chung, who admitted to a Senate committee in 1997 that he funneled $100,000 from the Chinese military to the Democratic National Committee.  In the Clinton White House, it was pay to play all the way.  That either Bill or Hillary had a political life after their treasonous run on Asian piggy banks is a testament to the ever escalating corruption of the American media.

The White House honcho who made the subways run on time – no shock here – was Hillary Clinton.  It was she who convened the secret meeting with adviser **** Morris in the White House treaty room a month after the Democrats' historic drubbing in November 1994.  Blamed for the debacle, the Clintons were running for their political lives.  To preserve those lives would take huge amounts of money, much of it, if not most, raised and spent illegally.

"The president and his top advisors took control of the DNC and designed a plan to engage in a historically aggressive fund-raising effort, utilizing the DNC as a vehicle for getting around federal election laws," the U.S. Senate Committee on Governmental Affairs, also known as the Thompson Committee, reported in March 1998.  "The DNC ran television advertisements, created under the direct supervision of the president."

The deepest pockets the Clintons plundered belonged to the Riadys, an ethnic Chinese family that worked out of Indonesia.  The Thompson Committee cited any number of large-scale Riady joint ventures in China, their principal partner in the People's Republic being an enterprise called China Resources, "a company wholly-owned and operated by the PRC government."  The Riadys had invested in Bill Clinton back in Arkansas and bailed him out during the 1992 primary campaign.  As payback, they were allowed to put their man John Huang in the Commerce Department.

And what were Huang's talents?  A letter sent by an Asian outreach advocate on the stationery of the then-president pro tem of the California state Senate was frank to a fault: "John is the Riady family's top priority for placement because he is like one of their own."  The Riady family, in case anyone needed reminding, "invested heavily in the Clinton campaign."  To some, those were credentials enough.

Huang's actual work was icing on the cake. The Thompson Committee makes this striking admission: "[a]lthough Huang's first day at Commerce was July 18, 1994, he was granted his first security clearance in January 1994."

Huang proved his worth in June 1994.  With Clinton crony Webster Hubbell on the ropes after a scandal forced him out of his job in the Justice Department, Huang arranged a $100,000 Riady payout to Hubbell.  This occurred two days after Huang and James Riady met with the president in the Oval Office and a week after Hillary met with Hubbell.  That payout – and $300,000 more – helped buy Hubbell's silence.  Despite a ton of legal pressure, he never talked.

It should have surprised no one that the Clintons would head for Indonesia a week after the November 1994 debacle.  They saw it coming and planned ahead.  Not only did the Clintons have to impress the Riadys on their own home turf, but they also had to start squeezing the CEOs accompanying them in a more systematic way.  It was about this time that the $100,000 donation to travel with the Clintons morphed from a discreet expectation into the price of admission.

The Thompson Committee described what happened during the next two years.  "The president and his aides demeaned the offices of the president and vice president, took advantage of minority groups, pulled down all the barriers that would normally be in place to keep out illegal contributions, pressured policy makers, and left themselves open to strong suspicion that they were selling not only access to high-ranking officials, but policy as well."  This was business as usual for Bill and Hillary Clinton.  "Millions of dollars were raised in illegal contributions," concluded the Thompson Committee, " much of it from foreign sources."

Nothing the Clintons have done in the last thirty years matches the scope of their treachery during this two-year period.  In the way of example, among those who enjoyed an intimate "coffee" with the president was one Wang Jun, chair of Poly Technologies, a company controlled by the People's Liberation Army.  One of Poly Technologies' profit centers was satellite production.  Another was the "importation and distribution of semi-automatic rifles for the U.S. domestic market."  Between 1987 and 1993, the company and its affiliates sold more than $200 million's worth of these guns in the United States.  Clinton pal Charlie Trie had greased the Wang Jun meeting with a $50,000 payment.

To the president's humble credit, as the Thompson Committee would later report, Clinton did admit that the meeting with Wang Jun was "clearly inappropriate."  The president did not apologize, however, for signing waivers for four more satellite launches by Chinese rockets on that same February 1996 day.  The president approved these waivers despite reports the month before that China continued to export nuclear technology to Pakistan and missiles to Iran, the latter deal suspected of being brokered by Wang Jun.

Just a week or so after Wang Jun's excellent Washington adventure, a Chinese Long March 3B rocket carrying the Loral-built Intelsat 708 satellite crashed just after liftoff and killed or injured at least sixty people in a nearby village.  This was the third Long March failure in the previous three years involving U.S.-built satellite payloads.

Loral CEO Bernard Schwartz, the largest single donor to the Clinton campaign, dispatched a Loral-led review team to China to assess the February 1996 failure of the Long March 3B rocket and suggest refinements.  The Cox Committee would later describe Schwartz's actions as "an unlicensed defense service for the PRC that resulted in the improvement of the reliability of the PRC's military rockets and ballistic missiles."  The White House pulled serious strings to prevent Schwartz from being prosecuted.

In the most outrageous deal of all, two months before the election, the president "unilaterally" declared a new 1.7-million-acre national monument in Southern Utah.  CNN's Wolf Blitzer did not shy from the implicit controversy.  He reported that the people of Utah were "furious."  They claimed that it was "a land grab" by the federal government "at the economic expense of the state."

Blitzer raised the issue of coal, perhaps $1 trillion's worth of clean, low-sulfur coal that would never be mined.  Blitzer, however, did not know the deeper significance of the coal.  Clinton did.  Said the president of this grand environmental gesture, "We can't have mines everywhere, and we shouldn't have mines that threaten our national treasures."  No, not everywhere, just in Indonesia.  In a stroke of the pen, Clinton had handed the Riadys a monopoly on the world's supply of low-sulfur coal.

Although Blitzer did not make the connection, the FBI did.  As an FBI agent observed after his interview with John Huang, "HUANG laughed in response to questions concerning j. riady's interest in Utah coal restrictions."

Huang and the Clintons and their cronies are laughing still.  They have convinced some healthy percentage of the Republican establishment that making a crude comment eleven years ago is a greater sin than betraying America for campaign cash.

Edited by kelownabomberfan
Atomic Experienced

Atomic

Posted
Posted
Quote

Huang and the Clintons and their cronies are laughing still.  They have convinced some healthy percentage of the Republican establishment that making a crude comment eleven years ago is a greater sin than betraying America for campaign cash.

This is the worst part really.  Decades of Clinton corruption and the people are outraged because Trump is rude.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

×
×
  • Create New...