JCon Posted February 9, 2017 Report Posted February 9, 2017 Just now, The Unknown Poster said: My point is, the NFL actually hid the information from players. There is no evidence the NHL did. The NHL cant be responsible for players in the 70's and 80's suffering CTE when no one knew what that is. Thats just a greedy cash grab. But the NHL is NOW showing ignorance. And they're going to lose. Maybe they're just trying to drive the settlement down. I'm not sure we know what info the NHL had or didn't have. But I wasn't trying to make a point, other than the timing worked out well for the NFL. And, well, it's never a good time for the NHL. I can understand why they plead ignorance but I wish the NHL would protect players more than they based on the science that's available today. The Unknown Poster 1
JCon Posted February 9, 2017 Report Posted February 9, 2017 3 minutes ago, Rich said: Sounds like a GM giving his coach a vote of confidence! "Pack your bags, dear, we're moving to Seattle!" Ducky 1
The Unknown Poster Posted February 9, 2017 Author Report Posted February 9, 2017 The denials are moot. Bettman literally denied there was even an inkling of the Thrashers moving to Winnipeg while simultaneously, True North's lawyers were preparing the purchase. I think the Coyotes probably do stay in Arizona because somehow they will get a sweet deal and the NHL has already bent over backwards to give them money.
Floyd Posted February 9, 2017 Report Posted February 9, 2017 34 minutes ago, Rich said: Pretty sure the Glendale Star can sue.
Ducky Posted February 9, 2017 Report Posted February 9, 2017 LeBrun is saying the Stars are having preliminary talks with the Pens about Fleury. I hope they get him so Lawless will shut his mouth about the Jets geting him. FrostyWinnipeg and Goalie 2
Goalie Posted February 10, 2017 Report Posted February 10, 2017 (edited) Fleury has worse numbers than Helle on a better team signed for big money. That's an easy pass for the Jets. Plus it's been reported that The Jets are on his list of teams that he WON'T agree to be traded to Edited February 10, 2017 by Goalie
The Unknown Poster Posted February 10, 2017 Author Report Posted February 10, 2017 Lawlesss said that?? It makes no sense. Fleury has, what 2-3 years left?? Not a chance The no trade thing isn't insurmountable in that it doesn't mean the jets wouldn't want him. They could always reach out to the agent and try and change minds. But really I don't see Jets being interested. And I'm a fleury fan. Lawless is pushing the idea the jets will get a new #1. Time will tell
Floyd Posted February 10, 2017 Report Posted February 10, 2017 Lawless is pushing any idea that will deflect blame from Maurice... Goalie 1
FrostyWinnipeg Posted February 10, 2017 Report Posted February 10, 2017 (edited) 2 hours ago, The Unknown Poster said: Lawlesss said that?? It makes no sense. Fleury has, what 2-3 years left?? Not a chance Cause he's 32? Ship, Brodeur was good until 40. Edited February 10, 2017 by FrostyWinnipeg
Atomic Posted February 10, 2017 Report Posted February 10, 2017 The Jets are on every no-trade list in the league, I'm sure. Floyd 1
Floyd Posted February 10, 2017 Report Posted February 10, 2017 2 hours ago, Atomic said: The Jets are on every no-trade list in the league, I'm sure. Obviously people don't know about the Human Rights Museum and the polar bear exhibit at the zoo. bearpants, Ducky and Brandon 3
The Unknown Poster Posted February 10, 2017 Author Report Posted February 10, 2017 29 minutes ago, Floyd said: Obviously people don't know about the Human Rights Museum and the polar bear exhibit at the zoo. If you can choose from 31 cities then it's a no brainer that the small, cold, high tax, low success teams will be on the no go list. But if the Jets were a cup contender things would be different for many players
Goalie Posted February 10, 2017 Report Posted February 10, 2017 10 hours ago, FrostyWinnipeg said: Cause he's 32? Ship, Brodeur was good until 40. No. Because he's worse than helle on a better team.
iHeart Posted February 10, 2017 Report Posted February 10, 2017 eh Mel is probably going to end up wearing a moose jersey
Goalie Posted February 10, 2017 Report Posted February 10, 2017 9 minutes ago, iHeart said: eh Mel is probably going to end up wearing a moose jersey He sucks so who cares
Ducky Posted February 10, 2017 Report Posted February 10, 2017 http://www.tsn.ca/tigers-red-wings-owner-ilitch-dead-at-87-1.669160
iHeart Posted February 10, 2017 Report Posted February 10, 2017 4 minutes ago, Ducky said: http://www.tsn.ca/tigers-red-wings-owner-ilitch-dead-at-87-1.669160 oh dear what will this mean for the Red Wings? and the Tigers? and Little Cesars for that matter
iHeart Posted February 11, 2017 Report Posted February 11, 2017 (edited) 19 minutes ago, The Unknown Poster said: and I would like it very much if he would sign an extension too, because he has been performing well this season despite his season starting injury Edited February 11, 2017 by iHeart The Unknown Poster and FrostyWinnipeg 2
The Unknown Poster Posted February 11, 2017 Author Report Posted February 11, 2017 9 minutes ago, iHeart said: and I would like it very much if we would sign an extension too, because he has been performing well this season despite his season starting injury Agreed. He's a key piece
Ducky Posted February 11, 2017 Report Posted February 11, 2017 How much does Little get his next contract and for how long? He'll be 30 when this one is done. Five years might be too long but I doubt he signs for less term. 5.25m x 4? Twenty-one million is pretty good for 4 years. The thing is, I think he is playing the best hockey of his career right now but still don't hink I would sign him for 5 years.
FrostyWinnipeg Posted February 11, 2017 Report Posted February 11, 2017 54 minutes ago, Ducky said: http://www.tsn.ca/tigers-red-wings-owner-ilitch-dead-at-87-1.669160 To honour him they should have a sale. What? What?! Don't give me that look.
Recommended Posts