Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

The offence sputtered once again when it was needed.   10 first downs in 3 quarters of football is flat out atrocious.     We forced two turnovers inside the 25 yd line and came away with 3 points!   Turn those into 2 TD's and we win this game.  Willy is still is very inaccurate with his throws and overthrowing or under throwing his receivers.  The boos he received tonight were well deserved.

The defense got shredded again tonight, but still gave us a chance to win.    This loss is on the O.


  I'm curious what the board here thinks on how much more time to give Willy?   Is the fact that we have no running game (no surprise there) contributing to his awful performance?  Should he be benched in favour of Nichols?  Thoughts?

Posted (edited)

Nichols isn't the answer. aquire Drew Tate. Guy gets over looked way too much imo. Probably wouldn't be too easy to pry away from Calgary, but some of you are saying we can get Burris? For what price. I doubt it 

Edited by CodyT
Posted

The film won't lie. If guys were open down field and he was dumping it late in game, he should be benched no matter how much he is making. A leader needs to be looking down field for the win when the game is on the line. As I have said before, he is not calling the plays. Need sideline routes to stop clock, need longer strikes down field. He was f'n around like they had 5 minutes on the clock

Posted
1 minute ago, Ripper said:

The film won't lie. If guys were open down field and he was dumping it late in game, he should be benched no matter how much he is making. A leader needs to be looking down field for the win when the game is on the line. As I have said before, he is not calling the plays. Need sideline routes to stop clock, need longer strikes down field. He was f'n around like they had 5 minutes on the clock

CFL contracts aren't guaranteed so they can release him if Walters wanted to but he doesn't.

Posted
3 minutes ago, CodyT said:

Nichols isn't the answer. aquire Drew Tate. Guy gets over looked way too much imo. Probably wouldn't be too easy to pry away from Calgary, but some of you are saying we can get Burris? For what price. I doubt it 

Tate would be out for the season within three series on our team.

Posted
Just now, Blueandgold said:

Tate would be out for the season within three series on our team.

He won't like the humidity in Winnipeg. His ora will be out of sync or something

Posted
2 minutes ago, iso_55 said:

CFL contracts aren't guaranteed so they can release him if Walters wanted to but he doesn't.

There is a cutoff where you have to pay the player for the remainder of the year I believe it is game 9

Posted
Just now, 17to85 said:

It's funny that people are pining for Kevin Glenn, because I remember not too long ago people were adamant that Glenn had to go for the same reasons they're unhappy with Willy now. 

QFT and khari before him. Its amazing how many people think the way to create a winning team is to have a mad carousel at QB till you strike gold. There is a reason why willy is struggling to do more then complete more then quick passes, and why harris is having his worst stretch running the ball too. It aint qb. Willy is no HOFer, and i doubt he ever develops into one. but he isnt whats stopping us from winning. 

Posted

and as for Burris, he already said no thanks to coming here once, why would he come here to get his ass kicked game in and game out at his age? Best we'd do is nut case Tate or broken down ginger Lulay. 

Posted

When your out of arguments it's easy to attack other posters as we're seeing above. Willy has demonstrated so clearly he doesn't have what it takes. 

But keep harping on stuff people may have said years ago. Lol.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...